green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
12.5 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“It makes little sense to strike down an entire statute in response to a facial attack when potential difficulties can be remedied in future cases through fact-specific as-applied challenges.”
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
"We conclude, therefore, that the CPPA is not unconstitutionally overbroad."
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“We conclude, therefore, that the CPPA.is not unconstitutionally overbroad.”
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2001
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Gonzales v. Free Speech Coalition
we conclude, therefore, that the cppa.is not unconstitutionally overbroad.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Gonzales v. Free Speech Coalition
we conclude, therefore, that the cppa is not unconstitutionally overbroad.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Pharmaceutical Research & Manufacturers of America v. Concannon
it makes little sense to strike down an entire statute in response to a facial attack when potential difficulties can be remedied in future cases through fact-specific as-applied challenges.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Harris v. Kilgore
O’Sullivan v. Boerckel, 526 U.S. 838, 842 (1999) (“Before a federal court may grant habeas relief,” the petitioner “must exhaust his remedies in state court.”); Sullivan, 528 U.S. at 844 (when an individual asserts that his “continued [state] confinement . . . violate[s] federal law, the state courts should have the first opportunity to review this claim and provide any necessary relief.”); McNair v. Campbell, 416 F.3d 1291, 1302 (11th Cir. 2005) (“Habeas petitioners generally cannot raise claims in federal court if those claims were not first exhausted in state court.”’).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Bentley v. Alabama Department of Mental Health
The exhaustion requirement rests on the principle of comity: when an individual asserts that his “continued [state] confinement . . . violate[s] federal law, the state courts should have the first opportunity to review this claim and provide any necessary relief.” 528 U.S. at 844.
discussed
Cited "see"
Parker v. Bruce
See Bishop v. Romer, 1999 WL 46688 , at *3 (10th Cir. Feb.3, 1999) (unpublished opinion), cert. denied, 527 U.S. 1008 , 119 S.Ct. 2346 , 144 L.Ed.2d 243 and 528 U.S. 844 , 120 S.Ct. 115 , 145 L.Ed.2d 97 (1999); see also Wendell v. Asher, 162 F.3d 887, 892 (5th Cir.1998) (“Absent exceptional circumstances, there is no automatic right to appointment of counsel in a civil rights case.”); Abdur-Rahman v. Mich. Dep’t of Corr., 65 F.3d 489, 492 (6th Cir.1995) (holding failure to appoint counsel in a section 1983 case was not error because an inmate “has no constitutional right to appointed c…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. James
See generally United States v. Hilton, 167 F.3d 61 (1st Cir.1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 844 , 120 S.Ct. 115 , 145 L.Ed.2d 98 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
McGuire v. Reilly
See United States v. Hilton, 167 F.3d 61, 71 (1st Cir.) (noting that “[i]t makes little sense to strike down an entire statute in response to a facial attack when potential difficulties can be remedied in future cases through fact-specific as-applied challenges”), cer t. denied, 528 U.S. 844 , 120 S.Ct. 115 , 145 L.Ed.2d 98 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Williams, Reginald
See United States v. Bilderbeck, 163 F.3d 971, 977-78 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 844 (1999); Crowder, 141 F.3d at 1209 ; United States v. Queen, 132 F.3d 991, 997 (4th Cir. 1997)./2 If such evidence otherwise passes the four-part test for Rule 404(b) evidence described above, it may be introduced against a defendant at trial. 3.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Reginald Williams
See United States v. Bilderbeck, 163 F.3d 971, 977-78 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 844 , 120 S.Ct. 114 , 145 L.Ed.2d 97 (1999); Crowder, 141 F.3d at 1209 ; United States v. Queen, 132 F.3d 991, 997 (4th Cir.1997). 2 If such evidence otherwise passes the four-part test for Rule 404(b) evidence described above, it may be introduced against a defendant at trial. 3.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Marshall
See, also, United States v. Bilderbeck, 163 F.3d 971, 975 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 844 , 120 S.Ct. 114 , 145 L.Ed.2d 97 (1999).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lusk
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 98-9635.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 1999.
Published
Citer courts: Ninth Circuit (2) · First Circuit (1)
C. A. 5th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.