green
Positive treatment
7.1 score
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. George Thunderhawk
However, after determining the full amount owed, the court “shall ... specify in the restitution order the manner in which, and the schedule according to which, the restitution is to be paid,” taking into account the defendant’s financial resources, projected earnings, and financial obligations. 18 U.S.C. § 3664 (f)(2); see United States v. Gray, 175 F.3d 617, 618 (8th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 909 , 120 S.Ct. 255 , 145 L.Ed.2d 214 (1999).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Brown
See United States v. Lawson, 173 F.3d 666, 671 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 909 , 120 S.Ct. 256 , 145 L.Ed.2d 215 (1999).
cited
Cited "see"
Bobbie Lee Lawson v. United States
See United States v. Lawson, 173 F.3d 666, 672 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 909 , 120 S.Ct. 256 , 145 L.Ed.2d 215 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
District of Columbia v. Mancouso
See, e.g., Coleman v. United States, 728 A.2d 1230 (D.C.1999) cert. denied 528 U.S. 909 , 120 S.Ct. 256 , 145 L.Ed.2d 215 (1999) and cases cited. 5 The Supreme Court has indicated that the origin of the knoek-and-announce rule may be traced as far back as a statute enacted in 1275, which itself was “but an affirmance of the common law,” Wilson v. Arkansas, 514 U.S. 927 , 932 n. 2, 115 S.Ct. 1914 , 131 L.Ed.2d 976 (1995) (citations omitted); see also Sabbath v. United States, 391 U.S. 585 , 88 S.Ct. 1755 , 20 L.Ed.2d 828 (1968).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Alaniz-Alaniz
v.
California
v.
California
No. 99-5515.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 1999.
Published
Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.