green
Positive treatment
3.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2000
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Bryan Blocker v. Denise Patch
Section 523(a) of the Bankruptcy Code exempts certain debts from discharge in bankruptcy, including debts "for willful and malicious injury by the debtor to another entity." To establish that a debt is nondischargeable consistent with this exception, the party seeking to prevent discharge must show by a preponderance of the evidence that the debt is for both "willful . . . injury" and "malicious injury." Id.; see Fischer v. Scarborough (In re Scarborough), 171 F.3d 638, 641 (8th Cir.) ("Willful and malicious are two distinct requirements . . . ."), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 931 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see"
Blocker v. Patch
Section 523(a) of the Bankruptcy Code exempts certain debts from discharge in bankruptcy, including debts “for willful and malicious injury by the debtor to another entity.” To establish that a debt is nondischargeable consistent with this exception, the party seeking to prevent discharge must show by a preponderance of the evidence that the debt is for both “willful ... injury” and “malicious injury.” Id.; see Fischer v. Scarborough (In re Scarborough), 171 F.3d 638, 641 (8th Cir.) (“Willful and malicious are two distinct requirements .... ”), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 931 , 120 …
discussed
Cited "see"
Bennett v. Reynolds
See Johansen v. Combustion Eng’g, Inc., 170 F.3d 1320, 1335 (11th Cir.1999) (describing “the essential legal issue [as] whether the rele *903 vant facts of this case, as indicated by the various BMW factors, constitutionally support the punitive damage award, i.e., do these facts indicate that [the defendant] had adequate notice that its conduct might subject it to this punitive damage award”), cert denied, 528 U.S. 931 , 120 S.Ct. 329 , 145 L.Ed.2d 256 (1999). 44 Whether a punitive damages award passes constitutional muster under this standard is a question of law that we review de novo…
discussed
Cited "see"
Johnson v. Fors (In Re Fors)
See Fischer v. Scarborough (In re Scarborough), 171 F.3d 638, 641 (8th Cir.1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 931 , 120 S.Ct. 330 , 145 L.Ed.2d 258 (1999). *137 1) Allegation that the bankruptcy court disregarded consent evidence offered as a defense Fors asserts that the bankruptcy court erred as a matter of law by improperly disregarding evidence he offered at trial that Johnson consented to the sexual relationship.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Baker v. National State Bank
Corp. v. Bonjorno, 494 U.S. 827, 835-36 , 110 S.Ct. 1570, 1575-76 , 108 L.Ed. 2d 842, 852 (1990) (stating that postjudgment interest compensates "`the successful plaintiff for being deprived of compensation for the loss from the time between the ascertainment of the damage and the payment by the defendant' ") (citation omitted); see also Johansen v. Combustion Eng'g, Inc., 170 F. 3d 1320 , 1339 (11th Cir.) (holding that postjudgment interest on remitted punitive damages award ran from date of entry of initial judgment because that was date damages were sufficiently ascertained), cert. denied, …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Combustion Engineering, Inc.
v.
McGill
v.
McGill
No. 99-252.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 12, 1999.
Cited by 3 opinions | Published
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.