green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
11.0 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
"[D]ecision whether to allow [ ] hybrid representation is within the sound discretion of the trial court."
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2000
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Commonwealth v. Baney
ecision whether to allow hybrid representation is within the sound discretion of the trial court.
discussed
Cited "see"
Com. v. Blatch, H.
See Commonwealth v. Pursell, 724 A.2d 293, 306 (Pa. 1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 975 (1999) (to establish trial counsel’s ineffectiveness for failing to call witnesses, defendant must show, infer alia, “that the witnesses were available and prepared to cooperate and would have testified on [Appellant’s] behalf and “that the absence of the testimony prejudiced the [Appellant]”). - 14 - J-S27011-20 J-S27012-20 2.
discussed
Cited "see"
Com. v. Geier, E.
See Commonwealth v. Pursell, 724 A.2d 293 (Pa. 1999) (approving post- conviction court’s refusal to consider issues raised in counseled appellant’s pro se petition), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 975 (1999); see also Commonwealth v. Ellis, 626 A.2d 1137, 1139 (Pa. 1993) (hybrid representation is not permitted and defendants have right to proceed without counsel only if decision is knowing and voluntary).
discussed
Cited "see"
Com. v. Ruggles, R.
See Commonwealth v. Pursell, 724 A.2d 293, 308 (Pa. 1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 975 (1999) (missing witness instruction not required “where the testimony of a witness is comparatively unimportant”) (citation omitted); see also Miller, supra at 645 ; Yale, supra at 983 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Com. v. Rodabaugh, S.
See Commonwealth v. Figueroa, 29 A.3d 1177 , 1180 n.6 (Pa.Super. 2011), appeal denied, 46 A.3d 715 (Pa. 2012), citing Commonwealth v. Pursell, 724 A.2d 293, 303 (Pa. 1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 975 (1999); Commonwealth v. Albrecht, 720 A.2d 693, 699-700 (Pa. 1998); Commonwealth v. Bennett, 930 A.2d 1264, 1273-1274 (Pa. 2007).
cited
Cited "see"
Com. v. Hollinger, D.
See Commonwealth v. Pursell, 724 A.2d 293, 311 (Pa. 1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 975 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Com. v. Maldonado-Rosado, W.
See also Commonwealth v. Pursell, 555 Pa. 233, 251 , 724 A.2d 293, 302 (1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 975 , 120 S.Ct. 422 , 145 L.Ed.2d 330 (1999) (affirming PCRA court’s denial of appellant’s pro se request to supplement PCRA petition while appellant was represented by counsel).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Com. v. Washington, D.
See also Commonwealth v. Pursell, 555 Pa. 233 , 724 A.2d 293 (1999), certiorari denied, 528 U.S. 975 , 120 S.Ct. 422 , 145 L.Ed.2d 330 (1999) (explaining PCRA provisions regarding waiver of issues, coupled with requirement of proper preservation of issues for appellate review, force petitioner to frame claims as “layered” ineffectiveness claims, because there has usually been waiver due to previous counsel’s failure to raise or preserve (Footnote Continued Next Page) -3- J-S13020-21 failing to raise the following arguments in the PCRA court: (1) trial counsel’s ineffectiveness for fail…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Bradbury
v.
Manor Healthcare Corp.
v.
Manor Healthcare Corp.
No. 99-6077.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 1, 1999.
Published
Citer courts: Superior Court of Pennsylvania (1)
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.