green
Positive treatment
7.0 score
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Davis
See United States v. Christmann, 193 F.3d 1023, 1024 (8th Cir.1999) (“The definition turns on what the weapon is designed to do, not on whether it is capable of doing its job at the particular moment that the crime was committed,” applying U.S.S.G. § 2B3.1), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1044 , 120 S.Ct. 1545 , 146 L.Ed.2d 358 (2000).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. James Osler
See United States v. Christmann, 193 F.3d 1023, 1025 (8th Cir.1999), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1044 , 120 S.Ct. 1545 , 146 L.Ed.2d 358 (2000); United States v. Hafiz, 129 F.3d 1011, 1013 (8th Cir.1997).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Larry E. Stott, Jr., Robert A. Gaughan, Also Known as Bob, and Lonnie M. Ford, Also Known as Lonnie
See United States v. Griffin, 194 F.3d 808, 817 (7th Cir.1999), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1044 , 120 S.Ct. 1546 , 146 L.Ed.2d 358 (2000).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Stott, Larry E., Jr.
See United States v. Griffin, 194 F.3d 808, 817 (7th Cir. 1999), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1044 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Reginald Williams
See United States v. Griffin, 194 F.3d 808, 820 (7th Cir.1999), ce rt. denied, 529 U.S. 1044 , 120 S.Ct. 1546 , 146 L.Ed.2d 358 (2000); United States v. Allison, 120 F.3d 71, 74 (7th Cir.1997); United States v. Long, 86 F.3d 81, 84 (7th Cir.1996); United States v. Curry, 79 F.3d 1489, 1495 (7th Cir.1996).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Benitez-Torres
See also, United States v. Matos- 10 Rodriguez, 188 F.3d 1300, 1309-12 (11th Cir. 1999), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1044 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jacob Harrison, Jr., United States of America v. Casey Seon Burnett
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Alicea, 205 F.3d 480, 486 (1st Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 909 (2000) (holding that high speed chase and shots fired at pursuing officers separately endangered police and public); see also United States v. Rodriguez-Matos, 188 F.3d 1300 (11th Cir. 1999), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1044 (2000); United States v. Miner, 108 F.3d 967 (8th Cir. 1997); United States v. Alexander, 48 F.3d 1477 (9th Cir. 1995); United States v. Swoape, 31 F.3d 482 (7th Cir. 1994).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Nina L. Schreiner v. Caterpillar, Incorporated
The district court did not stray from “ ‘the range of options from which one would expect a reasonable trial judge to select.’ ” United States v. Aldaco, 201 F.3d 979, 984 (7th Cir.2000) (quoting United States v. Van Dreel, 155 F.3d 902, 905 (7th Cir.1998)); see also United States v. Miller, 199 F.3d 416, 421 (7th Cir.1999), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1044 , 120 S.Ct. 1546 , 146 L.Ed.2d 358 (2000); United States v. Heath, 188 F.3d 916, 920 (7th Cir.1999).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Schreiner, Nina L. v. Caterpillar Inc
The district court did not stray from "’the range of options from which one would expect a reasonable trial judge to select.’" United States v. Aldaco, 201 F.3d 979, 984 (7th Cir. 2000) (quoting United States v. Van Dreel, 155 F.3d 902, 905 (7th Cir. 1998)); see also United States v. Miller, 199 F.3d 416, 421 (7th Cir. 1999), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1044 (2000); United States v. Heath, 188 F.3d 916, 920 (7th Cir. 1999).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Andy He
However, we have often noted that “not every variation from the verbiage of the indictment, either in terms of proof or jury instructions, constitutes á constructive amendment.” United States v. Baker, 227 F.3d 955 , 960 (7th Cir.2000), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 121 S.Ct. 1095 , 148 L.Ed.2d 968 (2001); see also United States v. Pigee, 197 F.3d 879, 886 (7th Cir.1999), cert. denied, Webb v. United States, 529 U.S. 1044 , 120 S.Ct. 1546 , 146 L.Ed.2d 359 (2000), cert. denied, Lipscomb v. United States, 530 U.S. 1269 , 120 S.Ct. 2735 , 147 L.Ed.2d 996 (2000); United States v. Willoughby, 27 …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. He, Andy
However, we have often noted that "not every variation from the verbiage of the indictment, either in terms of proof or jury instructions, constitutes a constructive amendment." United States v. Baker, 227 F.3d 955 , 960 (7th Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 121 S. Ct. 1095 (2001); see also United States v. Pigee, 197 F.3d 879, 886 (7th Cir. 1999), cert. denied, Webb v. United States, 529 U.S. 1044 (2000), cert. denied, Lipscomb v. United States, 120 S. Ct. 2735 (2000); United States v. Willoughby, 27 F.3d 263, 266 (7th Cir. 1994).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Olvera-Trejo
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 99-8371.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 27, 2000.
529 U.S. 1044
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.