green
Positive treatment
1.9 score
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Harmonia Holdings Group, LLC v. United States
See, e.g., McKart v. United States, 395 U.S. at 197 (“We cannot agree that application of the exhaustion doctrine would be proper in the circumstances of the present case.”). “‘[A]dministrative remedies need not be pursued if the litigant's interests in immediate judicial review outweigh the government's interests in the efficiency or administrative autonomy that the exhaustion doctrine is designed to further.’” McCarthy v. Madigan, 503 U.S. at 146 (quoting West v. Bergland, 611 F.2d 710, 715 (8th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 821 (1980)); see also Shalala v. Illinois Council o…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jones v. United States
See, e.g., McKart v. United States, 395 U.S. at 197 , 89 S.Ct. 1657 (“We cannot agree that application of the exhaustion doctrine would be proper in the circumstances of the present case.”). “ ‘[Administrative remedies need not be pursued if the litigant’s interests in immediate judicial review outweigh the government’s interests in the efficiency or administrative autonomy that the exhaustion doctrine is designed to further.’ ” McCarthy v. Madigan, 503 U.S. at 146 , 112 S.Ct. 1081 (quoting West v. Bergland, 611 F.2d 710, 715 (8th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 821 , 101 S.C…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Crowley v. United States
However, ‘“administrative remedies need not be pursued if the litigant’s interests in immediate judicial review outweigh the government’s interests in the efficiency or administrative autonomy that the exhaustion doctrine is designed to further.’ ” McCarthy v. Madigan, 503 U.S. at 146 , 112 S.Ct. 1081 (quoting West v. Bergland, 611 F.2d 710, 715 (8th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 821 , 101 S.Ct. 79 , 66 L.Ed.2d 23 (1980)); see also Shalala v. Illinois Council on Long Term Care, Inc., 529 U.S. 1,13 , 120 S.Ct. 1084 , 146 L.Ed.2d 1 , reh’g denied, 529 U.S. 1095 , 120 S.Ct. 1738…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Michelfelder
v.
Thomas Jefferson University White et ux. v. Security Pacific Financial Services, Inc. Luna v. County of San Bernardino Clanton v. Township of Redford Chappell, in Interest of A. M. K. v. Meese Cowhig v. Caldera, Secretary of the Army Smith v. Moore, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections Beckham v. Cain, Warden Silo v. Shalala, Secretary of Health and Human Services Coombs v. Pennsylvania Calhoun v. DeTella, Warden Abbey v. Robert Bosch GmbH
v.
Thomas Jefferson University White et ux. v. Security Pacific Financial Services, Inc. Luna v. County of San Bernardino Clanton v. Township of Redford Chappell, in Interest of A. M. K. v. Meese Cowhig v. Caldera, Secretary of the Army Smith v. Moore, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections Beckham v. Cain, Warden Silo v. Shalala, Secretary of Health and Human Services Coombs v. Pennsylvania Calhoun v. DeTella, Warden Abbey v. Robert Bosch GmbH
No. 99-1004; No. 99-1104; No. 99-1121; No. 99-1130; No. 99-1135; No. 99-1322; No. 99-5279; No. 99-7307; No. 99-7329; No. 99-7700; No. 99-7737; No. 99-7754.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 24, 2000.
529 U.S. 1095
Published
Opinion text not yet available. Try Google Scholar