discussed Cited "see" Whatley v. Merit Distribution Services See United States v. Majors, 196 F.3d 1206, 1215 (11th Cir.1999) (finding it was not an *1356 abuse its discretion to admit expert testimony without the benefit of a Daubert hearing), cert. den., 529 U.S. 1137, 120 S.Ct. 2022 , 146 L.Ed.2d 969 (2000); City of Tuscaloosa, 158 F.3d at 564 n. 21 (11th Cir.1998) (concluding that while complicated cases involving multiple expert witnesses may be well-served by the holding of a Daubert hearing, such hearings are not required by law or by rules of procedure); Jack B.

discussed Cited "see" Rudd v. General Motors Corp. See United States v. Majors, 196 F.3d 1206, 1215 (11th Cir.1999) (the trial court did not abuse its discretion in deciding to admit expert testimony without the benefit of a Daubert hearing after determining that the expert possessed specialized knowledge by virtue of his practical training and experience), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1137 , 120 S.Ct. 2022 , 146 L.Ed.2d 969 (2000); City of Tuscaloosa v. Harcros Chemicals, Inc., 158 F.3d 548 , 564 n. 21 (11th Cir.1998) (while complicated cases involving multiple expert witnesses are well-served by the holding of a Daubert hearing, such hearings are …

discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Joseph Diorio (069597) See, e.g., United States v. Majors, 196 A.3d 1206 , 1212 n. 14 (11th Cir.1999) (rejecting presumption in favor of allowing common scheme to be treated as part of single offense), cert, denied, 529 U.S. 1137 , 120 S.Ct. 2022 , 146 L.Ed.2d 969 (2000); United States v. Kramer, 73 A.3d 1067, 1072 (11th Cir.1996) (finding that statutory language and legislative history of 18 U.S.C.A. § 1956 (a)(2) indicates each transaction constitutes separate offense).

discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Rowsey See also United States v. Buckley, 192 F.3d 708, 709 (7th Cir.1999), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1137 , 120 S.Ct. 2021 , 146 L.Ed.2d 969 (2000). 4 The rationale behind this rule is that there is a risk that a violent response might result from brandishing, displaying, or possessing a dangerous weapon during the commission of a robbery.