Burket v. Angelone, 530 U.S. 1256 (2000). · Go Syfert
Search
Burket v. Angelone, 530 U.S. 1256 (2000). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case · “We would, of course, not only be authorized but also required to depart from [the prior decision] if an intervening Supreme Court decision actually overruled or conflicted with it.”
14 citation events (14 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: James Johnson v. K Mart Corporation (ca11, 2001-12-19)
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) James Johnson v. K Mart Corporation (2×) also: Cited "see"
11th Cir. · 2001 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
we would, of course, not only be authorized but also required to depart from if an intervening supreme court decision actually overruled or conflicted with it.
discussed Cited "see" Arthur D. Rutherford v. James v. Crosby, Jr. (2×)
11th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Provenzano, 215 F.3d 1233, 1235-36 (11th Cir.2000), ce rt. denied, 530 U.S. 1256 , 120 S.Ct. 2710 , 147 L.Ed.2d 979 (2000) (concluding that a claim that lethal injection constitutes cruel and unusual punishment does not meet the requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (b)(2)(A) or (B)).
discussed Cited "see" Clarence E. Hill v. James v. Crosby, Jr.
11th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Provenzano, 215 F.3d 1233, 1235-36 (11th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 530 U.S. 1256 , 120 S.Ct. 2710 , 147 L.Ed.2d 979 (2000) (concluding that a claim that lethal injection constitutes cruel and unusual punishment does not meet the requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (b)(2)(A) or (B)).” For this reason, we DENY appellant’s application for a stay of his execution pending appeal.
discussed Cited "see" Robinson v. Crosby
11th Cir. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Provenzano, 215 F.3d 1233, 1235-36 (11th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 530 U.S. 1256 , 120 S.Ct. 2710 , 147 L.Ed.2d 979 (2000) (concluding that a claim that lethal injection constitutes cruel and unusual punishment does not meet the requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (b)(2)(A) or (B)).
discussed Cited "see" James Johnson v. K-Mart Corporation
11th Cir. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Provenzano, 215 F.3d 1233, 1235 (11th Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 530 U.S. 1256 , 68 120 S. Ct. 2710 (2000) (“We would, of course, not only be authorized but also required to depart from [the prior decision] if an intervening Supreme Court decision actually overruled or conflicted with it.”); Cottrell v. Caldwell, 85 F.3d 1480, 1485 (11th Cir. 1996) (“Where prior panel precedent conflicts with a subsequent Supreme Court decision, we follow the Supreme Court decision.”).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Burket
v.
Angelone, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
No. 99A1052 (99-9917).
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 21, 2000.
530 U.S. 1256
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 57%
Citer courts: Eleventh Circuit (1)

C. A. 4th Cir. Application for stay of execution of sentence of death, presented to The Chief Justice, and by him referred to the Court, granted pending disposition of the petition for writ of certiorari. Should the petition for writ of certiorari be denied, this stay shall terminate automatically. In the event the petition for writ of certio-rari is granted, the stay shall terminate upon the sending down of the judgment of this Court.