Rael v. Williams, 531 U.S. 1083 (2001). · Go Syfert
Rael v. Williams, 531 U.S. 1083 (2001). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
67 citation events (67 in the last 25 years) across 8 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Starr (ncctapp, 2011-01-04)
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2001 2013 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" State v. Starr
N.C. Ct. App. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Lawrence, 352 N.C. 1, 27 , 530 S.E.2d 807, 824 (2000) (holding trial court properly exercised its discretion and “did not impermissibly deny the [jury’s] request [to review witness testimony] based solely on the unavailability of the transcript” where court instructed the jurors, “members of the jury, it is your duty to recall the evidence as the evidence was presented”), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1083 , 148 L.
cited Cited "see" Lawrence v. Cooper
4th Cir. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See Lav/rence v. North Carolina, 531 U.S. 1083 , 121 S.Ct. 789 , 148 L.Ed.2d 684 (2001) (denying petition for writ of certiorari).
discussed Cited "see" In re R.N.
N.C. Ct. App. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Lawrence, 352 N.C. 1, 16 , 530 S.E.2d 807, 817 (2000) (approving trial court’s holding a hearing to reconstruct missing testimony where State drafted narrative of witnesses’ testimony, witnesses testified that narrative accurately reflected their trial testimony, and court reporter reviewed her notes regarding objections and cross-examination), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1083 , 148 L.
discussed Cited "see" In Re Rn
N.C. Ct. App. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Lawrence, 352 N.C. 1, 16 , 530 S.E.2d 807, 817 (2000) (approving trial court's holding a hearing to reconstruct missing testimony where State drafted narrative of witnesses' testimony, witnesses testified that narrative accurately reflected their trial testimony, and court reporter reviewed her notes regarding objections and cross-examination), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1083 , 121 S.Ct. 789 , 148 L.Ed.2d 684 (2001).
cited Cited "see" State v. Tirado
N.C. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Lawrence, 352 N.C. 1 , 13, 530 S.E.2d 807 , 815 (2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1083 , 121 S.Ct. 789 , 148 L.Ed.2d 684 (2001).
cited Cited "see" State v. Tirado
S.C. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Lawrence, 352 N.C. 1, 13 , 530 S.E.2d 807, 815 (2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1083 , 148 L.
cited Cited "see" McLean v. Smith
M.D.N.C. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Rael v. Williams, 223 F.3d 1153, 1154 (10th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1083 , 121 S.Ct. 787 , 148 L.Ed.2d 683 (2001).
cited Cited "see" Ogden v. Bravo
10th Cir. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Rael v. Williams, 223 F.3d 1153, 1154 (10th Gir.2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1083 , 121 S.Ct. 787 , 148 L.Ed.2d 683 (2001).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Lane
N.C. · 2011 · signal: see also · confidence low
Ed. 2d 241 (1992); see also State v. Lawrence, 352 N.C. 1, 17-18 , 530 S.E.2d 807, 817-18 (2000) (reviewing trial court’s exclusion of expert witness testimony on behalf of defendant for error and finding none), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1083 , 148 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." In Re WR
N.C. · 2009 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Lawrence, 352 N.C. 1, 13 , 530 S.E.2d 807, 815 (2000) (holding that defendant failed to raise a constitutional issue at trial and therefore, waived appellate review of that issue), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1083 , 121 S.Ct. 789 , 148 L.Ed.2d 684 (2001).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." In re W.R.
N.C. · 2009 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Lawrence, 352 N.C. 1, 13 , 530 S.E.2d 807, 815 (2000) (holding that defendant failed to raise a constitutional issue at trial and therefore, waived appellate review of that issue), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1083 , 148 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Rogers
N.C. · 2002 · signal: see also · confidence low
App. 93, 100 , 515 S.E.2d 30, 36 , aff’d per curiam, 351 N.C. 92 , 520 S.E.2d 785 (1999); see also State v. Locklear, 294 N.C. 210, 217-18 , 241 S.E.2d 65, 70 (1978), we have also held that it is proper for a party to point out potential bias resulting from payment that a witness received or would receive for his or her services, State *463 v. Lawrence, 352 N.C. 1, 22 , 530 S.E.2d 807, 820 (2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1083 , 148 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Rael
v.
Williams, Warden
No. 00-6587.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 8, 2001.
531 U.S. 1083
Published

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.