green
Positive treatment
3.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2001
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re The Detention Of Victor Cannon v. State Of Washington
See In re Pet, of Turav, 139 Wn.2d 379, 408-13 , 986 P.2d 790 (1999) (The fact that mentally ill persons committed under chapter 71.05 RCW receive review hearings every 180 No. 69731-5-1/8 days and sexually violent predators only receive annual review hearings did not violate equal protection clause because there is a rational basis for distinguishing the two groups), cert, denied. 531 U.S. 1125 (2001): In re Pet, of Thorell. 149 Wn.2d 724 , 72 P.3d 708 (2003) (The fact that sexually violent predators do not have the same least restrictive alternatives as mentally ill people committed under ch…
discussed
Cited "see"
More v. Department of Retirement Systems
See In re Det. of Turay, 139 Wn.2d 379, 412 , 986 P.2d 790 (1999) (equal protection clauses of the United States and Washington Constitutions have the same impact and interpretation), ce rt. denied, 531 U.S. 1125 (2001).
cited
Cited "see"
In re the Detention of Thorell
See In re Det. of Turay, 139 Wn.2d 379, 409-10 , 986 P.2d 790 (1999), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1125 (2001).
discussed
Cited "see"
Stephenson v. State
See Appellant’s Br. at 53 (citing R. at 2,513, 3,647-48, Appendix 30-31.) The judge then properly granted Defendant a continuance allowing him sufficient time to review this newly discovered information, and to “pursue any avenues raised by its disclosure and to adjust its strategy accordingly.” Dye v. State, 717 N.E.2d 5, 12 (Ind.1999), cert. denied, — *491 U.S. -, 121 S.Ct. 879 , 148 L.Ed.2d 292 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re The Detention Of: Duane Brennan
However, in “Washington, sex offenders have reduced privacy interests because they threaten public safety.” Id.; see also In re Det. of Campbell, 139 Wn.2d 341, 355-56 , 986 P.2d 771 (1999), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1125 (2011).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
National Cable & Telecommunications Assn., Inc.
v.
Gulf Power Co. and Federal Communications Commission v. Gulf Power Co.
v.
Gulf Power Co. and Federal Communications Commission v. Gulf Power Co.
No. 00-832; No. 00-843.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 22, 2001.
Consideration, Motion, Petitions, Took.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
C. A. 11th Cir. Motion of AT&T Wireless Services, Inc., et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae granted. Certiorari granted limited to the following questions: “(1) Whether those provisions of the Pole Attachments Act apply to attachments by cable television systems that are simultaneously used to provide high-speed Internet access and conventional cable television programming. (2) Whether those provisions of the Pole Attachments Act apply to attachments by providers of wireless telecommunications services no less than to attachments by providers of wireline telecommunications services.” Cases consolidated, and a total of one hour allotted for oral argument.
Justice O’Connor took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and these petitions.Reported below: 208 F. Bd 1263.