Clark v. Johnson, 531 U.S. 1167 (2001). · Go Syfert
Search
Clark v. Johnson, 531 U.S. 1167 (2001). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
82 citation events (81 in the last 25 years) across 8 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Campbell (nc, 2005-08-19)
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2000 2013 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" State v. Campbell
N.C. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Steen, 352 N.C. 227, 238 , 536 S.E.2d 1, 8 (2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1167 , 148 L.
cited Cited "see" State v. Bartley
N.C. Ct. App. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Steen, 352 N.C. 227, 256 , 536 S.E.2d 1, 18 (2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1167 , 148 L.
cited Cited "see" state/city of Toledo v. Fisher, Unpublished Decision (12-30-2002)
Ohio Ct. App. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Smith (2000), 89 Ohio St.3d 323 , 328 , reconsideration denied (2000), 90 Ohio St.3d 1419 , certiorari denied (2001), 531 U.S. 1167 .
cited Cited "see" State v. Trull
N.C. Ct. App. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Steen, 352 N.C. 227 , 536 S.E.2d 1 (2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1167 , 148 L.
cited Cited "see" State v. Motley
N.C. Ct. App. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Steen, 352 N.C. 227, 241 , 536 S.E.2d 1, 9-10 (2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1167 , 148 L.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Ruiz-Tello
9th Cir. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Baron-Medina, 187 F.3d 1144, 1146-47 (9th Cir.1999), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1167 , 121 S.Ct. 1130 , 148 L.Ed.2d 996 (2001) (reasoning that the conduct reached by CaLPenal Code § 288(a) fell within the common, everyday meaning of “sexual abuse of a minor” and thus holding that a conviction under the statute was an aggravated felony for purposes of USSG § 2L1.2).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Wiley
N.C. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Steen, 352 N.C. 227, 249 , 536 S.E.2d 1, 14 (2000) (holding that trial court did not abuse its discretion by overruling the defendant’s objection to the state’s jury selection questions where the defendant had ample opportunity to explain the significance of mitigating circumstances to prospective jurors and the trial court fully *618 instructed the jury on the procedure for determining punishment), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1167 , 148 L.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Landeros-Vargas
9th Cir. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Castro- Baez v. Reno, 217 F.3d 1057, 1058-59 (9th Cir.2000) (applying the analysis set forth in United States v. Baron-Medina, 187 F.3d 1144, 1146-47 (9th Cir.1999), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1167 , 121 S.Ct. 1130 , 148 L.Ed.2d 996 (2001), to conclude that a prior rape conviction under CaLPenal Code § 261(a)(3) (1996) constituted an “aggravated felony” for sentencing purposes).
cited Cited "see" State v. Gainey
unknown court · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Steen, 352 N.C. 227, 256 , 536 S.E.2d 1, 18 (2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1167 , 148 L.
cited Cited "see" State v. Carpenter
N.C. Ct. App. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Steen, 352 N.C. 227 , 536 S.E.2d 1 (2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1167 , 148 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Cardenas
N.C. Ct. App. · 2025 · signal: see also · confidence low
However, “plain[-]error review is unavailable for issues that fall within the realm of the trial court’s discretion, such as Rule 403 determinations.” Id. at 821, 909 S.E.2d at 251 (cleaned up); see also State v. Steen, 352 N.C. 227, 256 , 536 S.E.2d 1, 18 (2000) (noting that our Supreme “Court has not applied the plain[-]error rule to issues which fall within the realm of the trial court’s discretion”), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1167 , 148 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Ellis
N.C. Ct. App. · 2025 · signal: see also · confidence low
However, “plain error review is unavailable for issues that fall within the realm of the trial court’s discretion, such as Rule 403 determinations.” Id. at 821, 909 S.E.2d at 251 (cleaned up); see also State v. Steen, 352 N.C. 227, 256 , 536 S.E.2d 1, 18 (2000) (“[T]his Court has not applied the plain error rule to issues which fall within the realm of the trial court’s discretion, and we decline to do so now.”), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1167 , 148 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Nelson Gongora v. Rick Thaler, Director
5th Cir. · 2008 · signal: see also · confidence low
Id. at 370 ; see also Clark v. Johnson, 227 F.3d 273, 281 (5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1167 (2001) (pre-Ring case holding that a reviewing court could examine the entire state record to determine whether any state court had made the requisite Tison findings).
cited Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Diaz-Cortes
9th Cir. · 2002 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Baron-Medina, 187 F.3d 1144, 1146 (9th Cir.1999), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1167 , 121 S.Ct. 1130 , 148 L.Ed.2d 996 (2001).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Clark
v.
Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division
No. 00-7519.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 20, 2001.
531 U.S. 1167
Published

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.