green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 4×
9.5 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 2 distinct cases, 2004–2024 · 2 courts ·
…when jurisdiction is invoked under the clayton act, the court examines the defendant's contacts with the united states as a whole to determine whether the requirements of due process have been met.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2001
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
ZERO TECHNOLOGIES, LLC v. THE CLOROX COMPANY
when jurisdiction is invoked under the clayton act, the court examines the defendant's contacts with the united states as a whole to determine whether the requirements of due process have been met.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
In Re: Automotive Refinishing Paint Antitrust Litigation Basf Ag and Basf Coatings Ag
(2×)
when jurisdiction is invoked under the clayton act, the court examines the defendant's contacts with the united states as a whole to determine whether the requirements of due process have been met.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Karaha Bodas Company, L.L.C. v. Perusahaan Pertambangan Minyak Dan Gas Bumi Negara (\Pertamina\")"
recognizing the difficulty of interpreting foreign law, courts may defer to foreign government interpretations.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Karaha Bodas Co. v. Perusahaan Pertambangan Minyak Dan Gas Bumi Negara
recognizing the difficulty of interpreting foreign law, courts may defer to foreign government interpretations.
cited
Cited "see"
Jaffer v. Standard Chartered Bank
See Access Telecom, Inc. v. MCI Telecommunications Corporation, 197 F.3d 694, 716 (5th Cir.1999), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 917 , 121 S.Ct. 275 , 292, 148 L.Ed.2d 200 (2000); see also Tex. Civ.
discussed
Cited "see"
Cappel v. Riaso, LLC
See Access Telecom v. MCI Telecommunications Corp., 197 F.3d 694, 717 (5th Cir.1999), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 917 , 121 S.Ct. 275 , 292, 148 L.Ed.2d 200 (2000) (“The mere renting or ownership of property in a forum is not enough [to create personal jurisdiction] when that property is not used to conduct business in the forum.”); see also Bryant v. Roblee, 153 S.W.3d 626, 630-31 (Tex.App.Amarillo 2004) (“Ownership of real property alone does not provide contacts sufficient to establish general jurisdiction over a nonresident corporation.”).
cited
Cited "see"
Animal Science Products, Inc. v. China National Metals & Minerals Import & Export Corp.
See 197 F.3d 694 , reh’g, en banc, denied, 210 F.3d 365 , cert. denied, 531 U.S. 917 , 121 S.Ct. 275 , 292, 148 L.Ed.2d 200 (2000).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Luebbers, Superintendent, Potosi Correctional Center
v.
White
v.
White
No. 00-130.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 2, 2000.
Cited by 3 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Third Circuit (2) · E.D. Pennsylvania (1)
C. A. 8th Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pawperis granted. Certiorari denied.