green
Positive treatment
6.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2001
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Empresa Cubana Del Tabaco v. Culbro Corporation
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Havana Club Holding, S.A. v. Galleon S.A., 203 F.3d 116, 120 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 918 , 121 S.Ct. 277 , 148 L.Ed.2d 201 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see"
Empresa Cubana Del Tabaco v. Culbro Corp.
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Havana Club Holding, S.A. v. Galleon S.A., 203 F.3d 116, 120 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 918 , 121 S.Ct. 277 , 148 L.Ed.2d 201 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see"
Matter of Marra
(2×)
See Goldstein v. Commission on Practice, 2000 MT 8, ¶ 27 , 297 Mont. 493, ¶ 27 , 995 P.2d 923, ¶ 27 , cert. denied sub nom Albers v. Supreme Court, 531 U.S. 918 , 121 S.Ct. 276 , 148 L.Ed.2d 201 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Johnson
(2×)
See Goldstein v. Commission on Practice, 2000 MT 8 , ś 27, 297 Mont. 493 , ś 27, 995 P.2d 923 , ś 27, cert. denied sub nom Albers v. Supreme Court, 531 U.S. 918 , *642 121 S.Ct. 276 , 148 L.Ed.2d 201 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Wenz
(2×)
See Goldstein v. Commission *381 on Practice, 2000 MT 8 , ś 27, 297 Mont. 493 , ś 27, 995 P.2d 923 , ś 27, cert. denied sub nom Albers v. Supreme Court, 531 U.S. 918 , 121 S.Ct. 276 , 148 L.Ed.2d 201 (2000).
cited
Cited "see"
Francolino v. Kuhlman
See Francolino v. New York, 531 U.S. 918 , 121 S.Ct. 277, 148 .
cited
Cited "see"
Ahmed v. Attorney General of California
See Park v. California, 202 F.3d 1146, 1150-51 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 918 , 121 S.Ct. 277 , 148 L.Ed.2d 202 (2000).
cited
Cited "see"
Walsh v. Gomez
See Park v. California, 202 F.3d 1146, 1151-53 (9th Cir.) (addressing Dixon), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 918 , 121 S.Ct. 277 , 148 L.Ed.2d 202 (2000); Calderon v. United States Dist.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Clifford Chaun Loyer v. Patrick Covello
See, e.g., Park v. California, 202 F.3d 1146, 1151-52 (9th 26 Cir.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 918 (2000). 27 Once, as in this case, a Court determines that a habeas petition contains only 28 unexhausted claims, it may dismiss the petition for failure to exhaust.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Novartis Consumer Health, Inc. v. Johnson & Johnson-Merck Consumer Pharmaceuticals Co.
Rorer, 19 F.3d at 134 (“the probative value of a consumer survey is a highly fact-specific determination and a court may place such weight on survey evidence as it deems appropriate”); see also Havana Club Holding, S.A. v. Galleon S.A., 203 F.3d 116, 131 (2d Cir.2000) (“A district court has broad discretion concerning the weight of particular evidence, including consumer surveys such as those proffered here-”), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 918 , 121 S.Ct. 277 , 148 L.Ed.2d 201 (2000). 10 In addition to challenging the objectivity of the Ford survey, J & J' disputes the District Court’s use…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Albers
v.
Supreme Court of Montana
v.
Supreme Court of Montana
No. 99-1930.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 2, 2000.
Cited by 6 opinions | Published
Sup. Ct. Mont. •Motion of Samuel Dash et al. for leave to file a brief as amid curiae granted. Certiorari denied.