Booth v. Churner, 531 U.S. 956 (2000). · Go Syfert
Booth v. Churner, 531 U.S. 956 (2000). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
88 citation events (88 in the last 25 years) across 31 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Taylor (ca1, 2002-03-26)
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2001 2013 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 38 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) United States v. Taylor
1st Cir. · 2002 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
he district court is granted 'especially wide latitude' in rule 403 balancing
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) United States v. Awadallah
S.D.N.Y. · 2002 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
he appropriate remedies do not include suppression of evidence or dismissal of the indictment.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Massey, Michael v. Helman, David W.
7th Cir. · 2001 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
congress has mandated exhaustion clearly enough, regardless of the relief offered through administrative procedures.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Douglas
1st Cir. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Li, 206 F.3d 78 , 89 (1st Cir.) (“[T]he proper starting point from which a departure is to be subtracted or to which it must be added is the greater of the guideline range or the mandatory minimum.”), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 956 , 121 S.Ct. 379 , 148 L.Ed.2d 292 (2000).
cited Cited "see" Shaw v. United States
E.D.N.Y · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Triana v. United States, 205 F.3d 36, 40 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 956 , 121 S.Ct. 378 , 148 L.Ed.2d 292 (2000); see also Whitaker v. Meachum, 123 F.3d 714, 716 (2d Cir.1997).
cited Cited "see" Cauthern v. State
Tenn. Crim. App. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Li, 206 F.3d 56 , 63-64 (1st Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 956 , 121 S.Ct. 379 (2000).
discussed Cited "see" Martinez v. Commonwealth
Va. Ct. App. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Li, 206 F.3d 56 , 61 (1st Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 956 , 121 S.Ct. 379 , 148 L.Ed.2d 292 (2000); United States v. Chaparro-Alcantara, 37 F.Supp.2d 1122, 1125-26 (C.D.Ill.1999), aff'd, 226 F.3d 616 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1026 , 121 S.Ct. 599 , 148 L.Ed.2d 513 (2000).
discussed Cited "see" Smeltzer v. Hook
W.D. Mich. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
In another provision of the PLRA, Congress defined the term “action,with regard to prison conditions” as "any civil proceeding ... with respect to the conditions of confinement or the effects of actions by government officials on the lives of persons confined in prison. ...” 18 U.S.C. § 3626 (g)(2); see Booth v. Churner, 206 F.3d 289, 295 (3d Cir.2000) (holding that, because § 1997e(a) and § 3626(g)(2) are substantially related, "it follows from the canon of interpretation invoked in [Sullivan v. Stroop, 496 U.S. 478, 484 , 110 S.Ct. 2499 , 110 L.Ed.2d 438 (1990)] that the identical t…
cited Cited "see" Vesco v. Snedecker
D.N.M. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Booth v. Churner, 531 U.S. 956 , 121 S.Ct. 377 , 148 L.Ed.2d 291 (2001) (Docs. 100, 101).
cited Cited "see" Allen, Guy L. v. Wayne Scott, Kyle Rackley
Tex. App. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Booth v. Churner 531 U.S. 956 , 121 S. Ct. 1819, 1820 (2001).
cited Cited "see" Bell v. Commonwealth
Va. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Li, 206 F.3d 56 , 61 (1st Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 956 (2000); United States v. Chaparro-Alcantara, 37 F. Supp. 2d 1122, 1125-26 (C.D.
cited Cited "see" Lang v. Campbell
6th Cir. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See Booth v. Churner, 531 U.S. 956 , 121 S.Ct. 1819, 1825 (2001); Freeman v. Francis, 196 F.3d 641, 643 (6th Cir. 1999); Wyatt v. Leonard, 193 F.3d 876, 878-79 (6th Cir.1999).
cited Cited "see" Amaro v. Taylor
D. Del. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See Booth v. Churner 206 F.3d 289, 300 (3d Cir.2000), cert. granted, 531 U.S. 956 , 121 S.Ct. 377 , 148 L.Ed.2d 291 (2000), aff'd, 532 U.S. 731 , 121 S.Ct. 1819 , 149 L.Ed.2d 958 (2001).
discussed Cited "see" Floyd v. Shelby County, Tennessee
W.D. Tenn. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See Booth v. Churner, 531 U.S. 956 , 731-33, 121 S.Ct. 1819, 1820-21 , 149 L.Ed.2d 958 (2001); Gurry v. Scott, 249 F.3d 493, 503-04 (6th Cir.2001) (citing cases); Knuckles El, 215 F.3d at 642 ; Wyatt v. Leonard, 193 F.3d 876, 877-79 (6th Cir.1999).
cited Cited "see" Serrano v. Alvarado
D.P.R. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally Booth v. Churner, 206 F.3d 289 (3rd Cir.2000), certiorari granted 531 U.S. 956 , 121 S.Ct. 377 , 148 L.Ed.2d 291 , affirmed.
cited Cited "see" Goode v. Correctional Medical Services, Inc.
D. Del. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See Booth v. Churner, 206 F.3d 289, 300 (3d Cir.2000), cert. granted, 531 U.S. 956 , 121 S.Ct. 377 , 148 L.Ed.2d 291 (2000), aff'd, 532 U.S. 731 , 121 S.Ct. 1819 , 149 L.Ed.2d 958 (2001).
cited Cited "see" Santiago v. Fields
D. Del. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See Booth v. Churner, 206 F.3d 289, 300 (3d Cir.2000), cert. granted, 531 U.S. 956 , 121 S.Ct. 377 , 148 L.Ed.2d 291 (2000), aff'd, 532 U.S. 731 , 121 S.Ct. 1819 , 149 L.Ed.2d 958 (2001).
cited Cited "see" Williams v. Yount
6th Cir. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See Booth v. Churner, 531 U.S. 956 , 121 S.Ct. 1819, 1825 , 149 L.Ed.2d 958 (2001); Freeman v. Francis, 196 F.3d 641, 643 (6th Cir.1999); Wyatt v.. Leonard, 193 F.3d 876, 878-79 (6th Cir.1999).
cited Cited "see" Roberts v. Taminga
6th Cir. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See Booth v. Churner, 531 U.S. 956 , 121 S.Ct. 1819, 1825 , 149 L.Ed.2d 958 (2001).
cited Cited "see" White v. County of Wayne
6th Cir. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See Booth v. Churner, 531 U.S. 956 , 121 S.Ct. 1819, 1822-25 , 149 L.Ed.2d 958 (2001); Wyatt v. Leonard, 193 F.3d 876, 878-79 (6th Cir.1999); Brown v. Toombs, 139 F.3d 1102, 1103-04 (6th Cir.1998).
cited Cited "see" Frank Jones v. Tim Smith, Correction Counselor Dr. A. M. Cordero
6th Cir. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See Booth v. Churner, 531 U.S. 956 , 121 S.Ct. 1819, 1825 , 149 L.Ed.2d 958 (2001).
cited Cited "see" Claybrooks v. Newsome
4th Cir. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
July 21, 2000); see Booth v. Churner, 531 U.S. 956 , 121 S.Ct. 1819 , 149 L.Ed.2d 958 (2001).
cited Cited "see" Claybrooks v. Newsome
4th Cir. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
Va. July 21, 2000); see Booth v. Churner, 531 U.S. 956 (2001).
cited Cited "see" Dean v. Odom
6th Cir. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See Booth v. Churner, 531 U.S. 956 , 121 S.Ct. 1819, 1825 , 149 L.Ed.2d 958 (2001); Freeman v. Francis, 196 F.3d 641, 643 (6th Cir.1999); Wyatt v. Leonard, 193 F.3d 876, 878-79 (6th Cir.1999).
discussed Cited "see" Burdine v. Johnson
5th Cir. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See Triana v. United States, 205 F.3d 36, 43 (2d Cir.) (“Application of the per se rule requires proof of the relevant circumstance, not speculation that it might be true.”), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 956 , 121 S.Ct. 378 , 148 L.Ed.2d 292 (2000).
cited Cited "see" Garrison v. Walters
6th Cir. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See Booth v. Churner, 531 U.S. 956 , 121 S.Ct. 1819 ,-, 149 L.Ed.2d 958 , 2001 WL 567712 , at *5 (May 29, 2001).
cited Cited "see" Owens v. Naylor
6th Cir. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See Booth v. Churner, 531 U.S. 956 , 121 S.Ct. 1819, 1822-25 , 149 L.Ed.2d 958 (2001); Brown v. Toombs, 139 F.3d 1102, 1103-04 (6th Cir.1998).
discussed Cited "see" Poirier v. Casperson
7th Cir. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See Booth v. Chumer, 531 U.S. 956 , 121 S.Ct. 1819, 1825 , 149 L.Ed.2d 958 (2001) (inmate must exhaust administrative remedies under § 1997e(a), even if the ultimate relief sought is not available through the administrative process); Perez, 182 F.3d at 536.
discussed Cited "see" Rivera v. Whitman
D.N.J. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
Indeed, Congress defined the term “action with regard to prison conditions” in another provision of the PLRA as “any civil proceeding ... with respect to the conditions of confinement or the effects of actions by government officials on the lives *341 of persons confined in prison.... ” 18 U.S.C. § 3626 (g)(2); see Booth v. Churner, 206 F.3d 289, 294 (3d Cir.2000) (holding that, because § 1997e(a) and § 3626(g)(2) are substantially related, “it follows from the canon of interpretation invoked in [Sullivan v. Stroop, 496 U.S. 478, 484 , 110 S.Ct. 2499 , 110 L.Ed.2d 438 (1990) ] tha…
discussed Cited "see" Johnson, Cedric v. Litscher, Jon E. (2×)
7th Cir. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See Booth v. Churner, 206 F.3d 289, 293-98 (3d Cir.2000), 2 aff'd. on other grounds, 531 U.S. 956 , 121 S.Ct. 1819 , 149 L.Ed.2d 958 (2001); Freeman v. Francis, 196 F.3d 641, 643-44 (6th Cir.1999).
cited Cited "see" Donald Green, Also Known as Sly, Also Known as Stone v. United States
2d Cir. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See Triana v. United States, 205 F.3d 36, 40 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 956 , 121 S.Ct. 378 , 148 L.Ed.2d 292 (2000).
cited Cited "see" Dellis v. Corrections Corp. of America
6th Cir. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See Booth v. Chumer, 531 U.S. 956 , 121 S.Ct. 1819 , 149 L.Ed.2d 958 (2001).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Brown-Windle v. Wilson
S.D. Ill. · 2025 · signal: see also · confidence low
Discussion Pursuant to the Prison Litigation Reform Act (“PLRA”), a prisoner may not file a lawsuit about prison conditions unless and until he has exhausted all available administrative remedies. 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a); see also Booth v. Churner, 531 U.S. 956 (2001).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Homdziuk
N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. · 2004 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Li, 206 F. 3d 56 (1st Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 956 , 121 S.Ct. 378 , 148 L.Ed. 2d 292 (2000); Waldron v. INS, 17 F. 3d 511, 518 (2d Cir.1993), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1014 , 115 S.Ct. 572 , 130 L.Ed. 2d 489 (1994).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Mello v. Sara Lee Corp.
N.D. Miss. · 2003 · signal: see also · confidence low
DISCUSSION A Standards for Ruling on Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) Motions Professors Wright and Miller write that “[t]he purpose of a motion under Rule 12(b)(6) is to test the formal sufficiency of the statement of the claim for relief; it is not a procedure for resolving a contest about the facts or the merits of the case.” Wright & Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure: CM 2d § 1356; see also Waste Control Specialists, LLC v. Envirocare of Texas, Inc., 199 F.3d 781 (5th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 956 , 121 S.Ct. 377 , 148 L.Ed.2d 291 (quoting Wright & Miller); Doe v.…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Charles Schwarz, Thomas Wiese, and Thomas Bruder, Justin A. Volpe and Michael Bellomo
2d Cir. · 2002 · signal: see also · confidence low
To prove a lapse in representation, a defendant must “demonstrate that some ‘plausible alternative defense strategy or tactic might have been pursued,’ and that the ‘alternative defense was inherently in conflict with or not undertaken due to the attorney’s other loyalties or interests.’ ” Levy, 25 F.3d at 157 (quoting Winkler, 7 F.3d at 309 ); see also Triana v. United States, 205 F.3d 36, 41 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 956 , 121 S.Ct. 378 , 148 L.Ed.2d 292 (2000).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Nunez v. Goord
S.D.N.Y. · 2001 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Booth v. Churner, 531 U.S. 956 , 121 S.Ct. 377 , 148 L.Ed.2d 291 (2000) (so long as a prison administrative process has some authority to take action in response to an inmate grievance, the PLRA exhaustion requirements apply); Santiago, 89 F.Supp.2d at 435 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Booth
v.
Churner
No. 99-1964.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 30, 2000.
531 U.S. 956

C. A. 3d Cir. Cer-tiorari granted.