green
Positive treatment
5.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2000
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Calderon v. Sisto
See Spivey v. Rocha, 194 F.3d 971, 977-78 (9th Cir.1999) ("A state court’s evidentiary ruling, even if erroneous, is grounds for federal habeas relief only if it renders the state proceedings so fundamentally unfair as to violate due process.”), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 995 , 121 S.Ct. 488 , 148 L.Ed.2d 461 (2000); Gonzalez v. Knowles, 515 F.3d 1006, 1011 (9th Cir.2008) (same).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ramirez v. Almager
See Spivey v. Rocha, 194 F.3d 971, 976 (9th Cir.1999), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 995 , 121 S.Ct. 488 , 148 L.Ed.2d 461 (2000) (aiding and abetting instruction consistent with California law did not violate due process).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gray v. Com.
See Bailey v. Commonwealth, 259 Va. 723 , 728, 734, 529 S.E.2d 570 , 573, 576, cert. denied, 531 U.S. 995 , 121 S.Ct. 488 , 148 L.Ed.2d 460 (2000) (sentence of death under Code § 18.2-31(7) and (12) for murdering wife and 2-year-old son).
discussed
Cited "see"
Victor Lamont Ridley v. Commonwealth
See Bailey v. Commonwealth, 259 Va. 723, 745-46 , 529 S.E.2d 570, 582-84 (treating the appellant’s claims—that his confession was not admissible (1) because it was obtained in violation of Miranda and (2) because it was involuntarily given—as two separate and distinct issues), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 995 (2000); Kauffmann, 8 Va. App. at 404-05 , 382 S.E.2d at 281-82 (same).
discussed
Cited "see"
Powell v. Commonwealth
See Bailey v. Commonwealth, 259 Va. 723, 747 , 529 S.E.2d 570, 584 , cert. denied, 531 U.S. 995 (2000) (a single indictment may charge two counts of capital murder of the same victim under Code §§ 18.2-31(7) and 18.2-31(12)).
discussed
Cited "see"
John Sexton v. Mike Kemna
(2×)
See Fuller v. Bowersox, 202 F.3d 1053, 1059 (8th Cir.) (trial attorney's failure to advise of applicable state post-conviction deadlines is not cause excusing procedural default), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 995 , 121 S.Ct. 489 , 148 L.Ed.2d 461 (2000); Weeks v. Bowersox, 106 F.3d 248, 250 (8th Cir.) (judge's failure to delineate every feature of state post-conviction relief is not cause), upheld on en banc review, 119 F.3d 1342 , 1350 n. 8 (8th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1093 , 118 S.Ct. 887 , 139 L.Ed.2d 874 (1998); Hart v. Purkett, 95 F.3d 638, 639 (8th Cir.1996) (judge's minor mistake in…
discussed
Cited "see"
John Sexton v. Mike Kemna
See Fuller v. Bowersox, 202 F.3d 1053, 1059 (8th Cir.) (trial attorney’s failure to advise of applicable state post-conviction deadlines is not cause excusing procedural default), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 995 (2000); Weeks v. Bowersox, 106 F.3d 248, 250 (8th Cir.) (judge’s failure to delineate every feature of state post-conviction relief is not cause), upheld on en banc review, 119 F.3d 1342 , 1350 n.8 (8th Cir. 1997), cert. denied, 522 -11- U.S. 1093 (1998); Hart v. Purkett, 95 F.3d 638, 639 (8th Cir. 1996) (judge’s minor mistake in explaining Rule 29.15 is not cause).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Gamble
We also find no violation of defendant’s right to present a defense (see Crane v Kentucky, 476 US 683, 689-690 [1986]; see also Spivey v Rocha, 194 F3d 971, 978 [9th Cir 1999], cert denied 531 US 995 [2000] [exclusion of evidence of unknown parties’ potential motives not constitutional error]).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Whitley
v.
Hall
v.
Hall
No. 00-6040.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 13, 2000.
Published
Sup. Ct. Fla. Certio-rari denied.