Dixon v. Regents of the Univ. of New Mexico, 532 U.S. 923 (2001). · Go Syfert
Search
Dixon v. Regents of the Univ. of New Mexico, 532 U.S. 923 (2001). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
23 citation events (23 in the last 25 years) across 12 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Raynor v. Connecticut (ctd, 2023-07-26)
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002 2014 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Raynor v. Connecticut
D. Conn. · 2023 · signal: see · confidence high
See Grace v. Rosenstock, 228 F.3d 40, 53 (2d Cir. 2000) (an amendment can be futile, and therefore not allowed, if the claim to be added would be barred by the applicable statute of limitations), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 923 (2001). 15 F. Claims under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1985 , 1986, and 1988 In addition to asserting claims under section 1983, Plaintiff states that he brings this action under sections 1985, 1986, and 1988.
cited Cited "see" Sonnier v. Recon Management Services Inc
W.D. La. · 2021 · signal: see · confidence high
See Yourman v Giuliani, 229 F.3d 124, 1285 (2d Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 923 , 121 S.Ct. 1362 (2001).
cited Cited "see" Craig Coates v. Dassault Falcon Jet Corp
8th Cir. · 2020 · signal: see · confidence high
See Yourman v. Giuliani, 229 F.3d 124, 128, 132 (2d Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 923 (2001).
discussed Cited "see" Dilworth v. Goldberg
S.D.N.Y. · 2012 · signal: accord · confidence high
Case law holds that “[wjhere there is ‘an inordinate delay’ between the filing of the complaint and the motion to amend, then the party seeking to amend has the burden ‘to provide a satisfactory explanation for the delay.’ ” Mahar v. U.S. Xpress Enters., Inc., 688 F.Supp.2d 95, 105 (N.D.N.Y.2010) (quoting Cresswell v. Sullivan & Cromwell, 922 F.2d 60, 72 (2d Cir. 1990)); accord Grace v. Rosenstock, 228 F.3d 40, 53-54 (2d Cir.2000) (“The court ... has discretion to deny leave to amend where the motion is made after an inordinate delay, no satisfactory explanation is offered for th…
discussed Cited "see" Scholtisek v. Eldre Corp.
W.D.N.Y. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See Yourman v. Giuliani, 229 F.3d 124, 128 (2d Cir.2000) (“the window of correction is not available if an employer engages in a practice of making impermissible deductions in its employees’ pay, or has a policy that effectively communicates to its employees that such deductions will be made”) (internal quotation marks omitted), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 923 , 121 S.Ct. 1362 , 149 L.Ed.2d 291 (2001).
cited Cited "see" Greenberg v. Malkin
2d Cir. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Grace v. Rosenstock, 228 F.3d 40, 53-54 (2d Cir.2000), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 923 , 121 S.Ct. 1362 , 149 L.Ed.2d 290 (2001); Commander Oil Corp. v. Bario Equip.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." In Re Enron Corp. Sec., Deriv. &\ ERISA\" Lit."
S.D. Tex. · 2004 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Grace v. Rosenstock, 228 F.3d 40, 53 (2d Cir.2000)(“‘the doctrine of equitable tolling applies ‘where the facts show that the defendant engaged in conduct, often itself fraudulent, that concealed from [the] plaintiff the existence of the cause of action.’ ’ ”), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 923 , 121 S.Ct. 1362 , 149 L.Ed.2d 290 (2001).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Pam Taylor v. Vermont Department Of Education
2d Cir. · 2002 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Yourman v. Giuliani, 229 F.3d 124, 128 (2d Cir.2000) (relying on both Auer and Christensen for the rule that, absent a conflict between the agency's interpretation and the regulatory language, the agency's construction of the regulation is entitled to deference), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 923 , 121 S.Ct. 1362 , 149 L.Ed.2d 291 (2001). 8 Plaintiff contends that the OSEP policy letter is not controlling because it predates both the 1997 statutory amendments and the 1999 amendments to the regulations.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Taylor v. Vermont Department of Education
2d Cir. · 2002 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Yourman v. Giuliani, 229 F.3d 124, 128 (2d Cir.2000) (relying on both Auer and Christensen for the rule that, absent a conflict between the agency's interpretation and the regulatory language, the agency's construction of the regulation is entitled to deference), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 923 , 121 S.Ct. 1362 , 149 L.Ed.2d 291 (2001). .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Champagne v. Diblasi
2d Cir. · 2002 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Grace v. Rosenstock, 228 F.3d 40, 55 (2d Cir.2000), cert. denied 532 U.S. 923 , 121 S.Ct. 1362 , 149 L.Ed.2d 290 (2001); Fay v. South Colonie Central School District, 802 F.2d 21, 34 (2d Cir.1986).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Dixon
v.
Regents of the University of New Mexico
No. 00-1217.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 19, 2001.
532 U.S. 923
Published

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.