green
Positive treatment
1.6 score
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Tomick v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
Co ., 675 F.2d 811 , 814 (6th Cir. 1982) (civil rights statute authorizing "actual and punitive damages" gives rise to claim for "legal relief" creating right to jury trial under seventh amendment); but see Snapp v. Unlimited Concepts, Inc ., 208 F.3d 928 , 934-36 (11th Cir. 2000) (observing that " '[l]egal relief' is certainly a broad formulation" but disagreeing with Seventh Circuit's decision in Travis on basis of other language in Fair Labor Standards Act, which it viewed as representative of Congress' intent that damages be compensatory, including liquidated damages provision), cert. deni…
discussed
Cited "see"
Bartee v. Quarterman
See Knox v. Johnson, 224 F.3d 470, 482 (5th Cir.2000) (witness’s subjective hope the State would recognize his assistance did not establish the State had even subtly offered him a deal for his testimony), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 975 , 121 S.Ct. 1610 , 149 L.Ed.2d 475 (2001); Hill v. Johnson, 210 F.3d 481, 486 (5th Cir.2000) (subjective beliefs of witnesses regarding the possibility of future favorable treatment are insufficient to trigger the State’s duty to disclose under Brady), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 1039 , 121 S.Ct. 2001 , 149 L.Ed.2d 1004 (2001); Goodwin v. Johnson, 132 F.3d 162, 187 (…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Frye
See Knox v. Johnson, 224 F.3d 470, 477 (5th Cir.2000) (“delay of less than one year will rarely qualify as ‘presumptively prejudicial’ ”) (quoting Cowart v. Hargett, 16 F.3d 642, 646 (5th Cir.1994)), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 975 , 121 S.Ct. 1610 , 149 L.Ed.2d 475 (2001).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Altenhofen v. Fabricor, Inc.
Compare Travis v. Gary Cmty. Mental Health Ctr., Inc., 921 F.2d 108 (7th Cir. 1990), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 812 , 112 S.Ct. 60 , 116 L.Ed.2d 36 (1991) (holding that when Congress amended § 216(b) in 1977 by adding “legal relief’ to the remedies it allows, Congress was opening the door to the traditional tort remedies of compensatory and punitive damages), with Snapp v. Unlimited Concepts, Inc., 208 F.3d 928 (11th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 975 , 121 S.Ct. 1609 , 149 L.Ed.2d 474 (2001) (holding punitive damages are not available for violation of FLSA’s anti-retaliation *591 provis…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Amavisca
v.
California
v.
California
No. 00-6859.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 16, 2001.
Published
Ct. App. Cal., 5th App. Dist. Certiorari denied.