discussed Cited "see" In Re Aspartame Antitrust Litigation See Forbes v. Eagleson, 228 F.3d 471, 487 (3d Cir.2000) (“Absent evidence to support these findings there is no genuine dispute of material fact on the issue and the defendants are entitled to summary judgment.”), cer t. denied, 533 U.S. 929 , 121 S.Ct. 2551 , 150 L.Ed.2d 718 (2001).

discussed Cited "see" State v. North Atlantic Refining Limited See Clune v. Alimak AB, 233 F.3d 538, 544 (8th Cir. 2000) (rejecting defendant’s argument that it was unaware of what happened to its products after they left Swedish port), cert. denied, 533 U.S. 929 (2001).

cited Cited "see" Chisholm v. Hood See Hopwood v. Texas, 236 F.3d 256, 281 (5th Cir.2000), cert. denied by 533 U.S. 929 , 121 S.Ct. 2550 , 150 L.Ed.2d 717 (2001).

cited Cited "see" Valencia Carmichael v. Nissan Motor Acceptance See Applebaum v. Nissan Motor Acceptance Corp., 226 F.3d 214, 217-18 (3d Cir.2000) (discussing the purpose of the legislation), cert. denied, 533 U.S. 929 , 121 S.Ct. 2549 , 150 L.Ed.2d 717 (2001).