green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
7.2 score
“reynolds i”
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2001
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Burton v. Renico
See Gall v. Parker, 231 F.3d 265 , 287 n.4 (6th Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 533 U.S. 941 (2001) (noting the complexity of cases where “an ingredient can arguably be both an element of a charged crime and of a defense, or the presence of a defense can arguably negate a required element”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kumal Burton v. Paul Renico, Warden
See Gall v. Parker, 231 F.3d 265 , 287 n.4 (6th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 533 U.S. 941 , 121 S.Ct. 2577 , 150 L.Ed.2d 739 (2001) (noting the complexity of cases where “an ingredient can arguably be both ah element of a charged crime and of a defense, or the presence of a defense can arguably negate a required element”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Thomas Clyde Bowling, Jr. v. Phillip Parker, Warden
(2×)
See Gall v. Parker, 231 F.3d 265, 321 (6th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 533 U.S. 941 , 121 S.Ct. 2577 , 150 L.Ed.2d 739 (2001).
discussed
Cited "see"
Warren Wesley Summerlin v. Terry L. Stewart, Director of Arizona Department of Corrections
(2×)
See Gall v. Parker, 231 F.3d 265, 323-24 (6th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 533 U.S. 941 , 121 S.Ct. 2577 , 150 L.Ed.2d 739 (2001); Williams v. Dixon, 961 F.2d 448, 455-57 (4th Cir.1992). 21 In Williams, Chief Judge Ervin analyzed the Mills/McKoy rule in detail and concluded that: “Given the history of the Eighth Amendment jurisprudence and the constitutional requirement of individualized sentences, we believe that a rule striking down an arbitrary unanimity requirement has the same ‘primacy and centrality’ of Gideon [v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 , 83 S.Ct. 792 , 9 L.Ed.2d 799 (1963)].” 961 …
discussed
Cited "see"
Kou Lo Vang v. State of Nevada
See Anthony v. Cambra, 236 F.3d 568, 574 (9th Cir.2000) (requiring district courts to “provide habeas litigants with the opportunity to amend their mixed petitions by striking unexhausted claims as an alternative to suffering dismissal”), cert. denied, 533 U.S. 941 , 121 S.Ct. 2576 , 150 L.Ed.2d 739 (2001).
cited
Cited "see"
Ford v. Hubbard
See Anthony v. Cambra, 236 F.3d 568, 575-77 (9th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 533 U.S. 941 , 121 S.Ct. 2576 , 150 L.Ed.2d 739 (2001).
cited
Cited "see"
Richard Herman Ford v. S. Hubbard, Warden Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General, Richard Herman Ford v. S. Hubbard, Warden Attorney General of the State of California, Richard Herman Ford v. United States District Court for the Central District of California, S. Hubbard, Warden, Real Party in Interest. Richard Herman Ford v. S. Hubbard, Warden, Richard Herman Ford v. United States District Court for the Central District of California, S. Hubbard, Warden, Real Party in Interest
See Anthony v. Cambra, 236 F.3d 568, 575-77 (9th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 533 U.S. 941 , 121 S.Ct. 2576 , 150 L.Ed.2d 739 (2001).
cited
Cited "see"
James Edward Smith v. J.M. Ratelle B. Kathleen Blanchard
See Anthony v. Cambra, 236 F.3d 568, 571 , 574 & n. 1 (9th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 533 U.S. 941 , 121 S.Ct. 2576 , 150 L.Ed.2d 739 (2001).
discussed
Cited "see"
Seals v. Clark
See Anthony v. Cambra, 236 F.3d 568, 575 (9th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 533 U.S. 941 , 121 S.Ct. 2576 , 150 L.Ed.2d 739 (2001) (holding that prison "mailbox rule” applies to state as well as federal habeas petitions).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Jenewicz
(2×)
See, e.g., State v. Sexton, 311 N.J.Super. 70, 81 , 709 A.2d 288 (App.Div.1998) (finding prosecutorial misconduct where prosecutor stated in summation that gun belonged to defendant, when prosecutor had actual knowledge or reason to know that that was not so), aff'd, 160 N.J. 93 , 733 A.2d 1125 (1999); State v. Ross, 249 N.J.Super. 246, 250 , 592 A.2d 291 (App.Div.1991) (concluding that prosecutor’s reference to victim’s naiveté and lack of motive constituted plain error because prosecution knew, based on excluded evidence, that victim previously had alleged sexual abuse); see also Gall v…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jeffrey Glenn Galloway
(2×)
See, e.g., Gall v. Parker, 231 F.3d 265, 312 (6th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 533 U.S. 941 , 121 S.Ct. 2577 , 150 L.Ed.2d 739 (2001).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Mays
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 00-10162.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 25, 2001.
533 U.S. 941
Published
Citer courts: Eleventh Circuit (1)
C. A. 4th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.