green
Positive treatment
6.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Noguera v. Davis
See United States v. Percy, 250 F.3d 720 , 729 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1009 , 122 S.Ct. 493 , 151 L.Ed.2d 405 (2001). 2.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Chyung
Rather, the court applies a reasonableness standard and examines the facts and circumstances of each case." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) United States v. Cuch , 842 F.2d 1173 , 1178 (10th Cir. 1988) ; accord United States v. Franklin , 250 F.3d 653 , 659 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1009 , 122 S.Ct. 495 , 151 L.Ed.2d 406 (2001) ; United States v. Fields , 871 F.2d 188 , 197-98 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 955 , 110 S.Ct. 369 , 107 L.Ed.2d 355 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Dupris
See United States v. Percy, 250 F.3d 720, 725-27 (9th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1009 , 122 S.Ct. 493 , 151 L.Ed.2d 405 (2001). 6 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Felipe Lothridge
See United States v. Franklin, 250 F.3d 653, 659 (8th Cir.) (“the presence of a limiting instruction diminishes the danger of any unfair prejudice arising from admission of other acts”), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1009 , 122 S.Ct. 495 , 151 L.Ed.2d 406 (2001).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Felipe Lothridge
See United States v. Franklin, 250 F.3d 653, 659 (8th Cir.) ("the presence of a limiting instruction diminishes the danger of any unfair prejudice arising from admission of -2- other acts"), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1009 (2001).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. James Manuel Banuelos
(2×)
See United States v. Saya, 247 F.3d 929, 942 (9th Cir.) (suggesting that Apprendi error will be harmless unless the sentence imposed exceeds the statutory maximum authorized by the guilty verdict), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1009 , 122 S.Ct. 493 , 151 L.Ed.2d 404 (2001).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. O'Neal
See United States v. Saya, 247 F.3d 929, 942 (9th Cir.) (stating that a defendant is not entitled to relief under Apprendi when his sentence does not exceed the statutory maximum authorized by the jury’s verdict), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1009 , 122 S.Ct. 493 , 151 L.Ed.2d 404 (2001).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Saya
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 01-6436.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 29, 2001.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certio-rari denied.