discussed Cited "see" Hart v. State See State v. Lucas, 199 Ariz. 366, 369 , 18 P.3d 160, 163 (Ct. App. 2001) (holding that, “[r]egardless of how many other nondiscriminatory factors are considered, any consideration of a discriminatory factor directly conflicts with the purpose of Batson and taints the entire jury selection process”), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1014 (2001); People v. Douglas, 22 Cal. App. 5th 1162, 1164-65 , 232 Cal. Rptr. 3d 305, 307 (Ct. App. 2018) (rejecting the dual-motivation approach and holding that jury selection “should be free of any bias”) (emphasis in original); People v. Johnson, 523 P.3d 992 ,…

discussed Cited "see" Makenta v. University of Pennsylvania See Eichorn v. AT & T Corp., 248 F.3d 131, 150 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1014 , 122 S.Ct. 506 , 151 L.Ed.2d 415 (2001) (quoting Dewitt, 106 F.3d at 523 (quoting Gavalik, 812 F.2d at 851 )); Hendricks v. *505 Edgewater Steel Co., 898 F.2d 385, 389 (3d Cir.1990) (citing Gavalik, 812 F.2d at 852 ).

discussed Cited "see, e.g." Alan D. Gordon, M.D. Alan D. Gordon, M.D., P.C., a Corporation Mifflin County Community Surgical Center, a Corporation v. Lewistown Hospital See also Eichorn v. AT & T Corp., 248 F.3d 131, 144-45 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1014 , 122 S.Ct. 506 , 151 L.Ed.2d 415 (2001) (indicating totality of circumstances considered under rule of reason includes facts peculiar to particular business to determine the nature and purpose of the allegedly illegal restraint).