Tuter v. United States, 534 U.S. 886 (2001). · Go Syfert
Search
Tuter v. United States, 534 U.S. 886 (2001). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
57 citation events (57 in the last 25 years) across 15 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Fields v. Miller (nysd, 2023-11-06)
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002 2014 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Fields v. Miller
S.D.N.Y. · 2023 · signal: see · confidence high
See Pa anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). 4 Under the so-called “prison mailbox rule,” see -ouston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 270 , (1988), a pro se prisoner's habeas petition is deemed filed on the date he gives it to prison officials for delivery to the Court, see Pl \oble v. Kelly, 246 F.3d 93, 97 (2d Cir. 2001), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 886 .
cited Cited "see" Harnage v. Cook
D. Conn. · 2021 · signal: see · confidence high
See Noble v. Kelly, 246 F.3d 93, 97 (2d Cir.) (discussing prison mailbox rule), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 886 (2001).
cited Cited "see" Burrell v. Quiros
D. Conn. · 2021 · signal: see · confidence high
See Noble v. Kelly, 246 F.3d 93, 97 (2d Cir.) (discussing prison mailbox rule), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 886 (2001).
discussed Cited "see" Fashaw v. Griffin
S.D.N.Y. · 2020 · signal: see · confidence high
See Noble v. Kelly, 246 F.3d 93, 97-98 (2d Cir. 2001) (under the "prison mailbox rule,"an incarcerated petitioner's pleading is deemed filed on the date it is given to correctional authorities to mail),cert. denied, 534 U.S. 886 (2001). 12 B.
cited Cited "see" Hamilton v. Warden of Clinton Correctional Facility
S.D.N.Y. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See Noble v. Kelly, 246 F.3d 93, 97-98 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 886 , 122 S.Ct. 197 , 151 L.Ed.2d 139 (2001).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Bradshaw
N.J. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See Noble v. Kelly, 246 F.3d 93, 100 (2d Cir.) (holding that because less onerous sanctions were available to minimize prejudice to prosecution, finding of willfulness required to justify exclusion), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 886 , 122 S.Ct. 197 , 151 L.Ed.2d 139 (2001); United States v. Peters, 937 F.2d 1422, 1426 (9th Cir.1991) (declaring that because of accused’s fundamental right to present witnesses in his or her own defense, witness exclusions only upheld in cases involving willful and blatant discovery violations).
discussed Cited "see" Hill v. Senkowski
W.D.N.Y. · 2006 · signal: accord · confidence high
Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 270-71 , 108 S.Ct. 2379 , 101 L.Ed.2d 245 (1988); accord, e.g., Noble v. Kelly, 246 F.3d 93, 97 (2d Cir.) (“We conclude that the district court properly extended the prison mailbox rule to petitions for writs of habeas corpus.”), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 886 , 122 S.Ct. 197 , 151 L.Ed.2d 139 (2001).
discussed Cited "see" McCalla v. Greiner
W.D.N.Y. · 2005 · signal: accord · confidence high
Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 270-71 , 108 S.Ct. 2379 , 101 L.Ed.2d 245 (1988); accord, e.g., Noble v. Kelly, 246 F.3d 93, 97 (2d Cir.) (“We conclude that the district court properly extended the prison mailbox rule to petitions for writs of habeas corpus.”) ( & citing cases for other federal applications of the rule), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 886 , 122 S.Ct. 197 , 151 L.Ed.2d 139 (2001).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Vanness
10th Cir. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Tuter, 240 F.3d 1292, 1299 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 886 , 122 S.Ct. 195 , 151 L.Ed.2d 137 (2001).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." People v. Collins
N.Y. App. Div. · 2006 · signal: see also · confidence low
In any event, even assuming, arguendo, that a notice of alibi was required, we conclude that the court abused its discretion in failing to engage in the requisite analysis to balance “the fundamental character of the defendant’s right to offer the testimony of witnesses in his favor [pursuant to US Constitution Amendment VI against] . . . the interest in the fair and efficient administration of justice” (Taylor v Illinois, 484 US 400, 414-415 [1988], reh denied 485 US 983 [1988]; see also Noble v Kelly, 246 F3d 93, 99 [2001], cert denied 534 US 886 [2001]; cf. People v Noble, 209 AD2d 73…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Mitchell v. McCaughtry
E.D. Wis. · 2003 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Noble v. Kelly, 246 F.3d 93, 97 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 886 , 122 S.Ct. 197 , 151 L.Ed.2d 139 (2001) (stating that mailbox rule had been extended to service and filing of various papers). 12 .Because timeliness is an affirmative defense, I do not ordinarily address it on initial screening.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Carracedo v. Artuz
2d Cir. · 2003 · signal: see also · confidence low
"Post AEDPA Second Circuit cases have declined to rule on this issue, finding instead that the result is the same under either standard.” Ryan, 303 F.3d at 254 (collecting cases); see also Noble v. Kelly, 246 F.3d 93 , 101 n. 5 (2d Cir.2001) ("Because we conclude that the error was not harmless under both possible standards of review, we decline to express a view as to which standard should apply.”), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 886 , 122 S.Ct. 197 , 151 L.Ed.2d 139 (2001); Lyons v. Johnson, 99 F.3d 499, 503 (2d Cir.1996) (same).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Bohan v. Kuhlmann (2×)
S.D.N.Y. · 2002 · signal: see also · confidence low
See id. at 410, 108 S.Ct. 646 ; see also Noble v. Kelly, 89 F.Supp.2d 443, 454 (2000), aff'd, 246 F.3d 93 (2d Cir.), cert denied, 534 U.S. 886 , 122 S.Ct. 197 , 151 L.Ed.2d 139 (2001).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Tuter
v.
United States
No. 01-11.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 1, 2001.
534 U.S. 886
Published

C. A. 10th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.