green
Positive treatment
4.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Arar v. Ashcroft
See Arar, 414 F. Supp. 2d at 285, 287 . 69 1 proceeded under the wrong theory 'so long as [he has] alleged facts 2 sufficient to support a meritorious legal claim.'" Hack v. 3 President & Fellows of Yale College, 237 F.3d 81, 89 (2d Cir. 2000) 4 (quoting Northrop v. Hoffman of Simsbury, Inc., 134 F.3d 41, 46 (2d 5 Cir. 1997)), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 888 (2001).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Timmins
See Odle v. Woodford, 238 F.3d 1084, 1088-89 (9th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 888 , 122 S.Ct. 201 , 151 L.Ed.2d 142 (2001) (holding that, while defense counsel may be in the best position to evaluate a client's ability to participate in his defense, a lawyer is not a trained mental health professional capable of accurately assessing the effects of paranoid delusions on the client's mental processes). . 18 U.S.C. § 4241 (a). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Miles v. Stainer
See Odle v. Woodford, 238 F.3d 1084, 1090 (9th Cir.)(discussing the types of new and old evidence that should be available in order to ensure that a defendant receives a fair retrospective hearing), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 888 , 122 S.Ct. 201 , 151 L.Ed.2d 142 (2001); de Kaplany v. Enomoto, 540 F.2d 975, 985-86 (9th Cir.1976)(same).
discussed
Cited "see"
Spickler v. Lee
See, e.g., Gonzalez-Morales v. Hernandez-Arencibia, 221 F.3d 45, 47-51 (1st Cir.2000); accord, e.g., Hack v. President and Fellows of Yale College, 237 F.3d 81, 84-85 (2d Cir.2000), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 888 , 122 S.Ct. 201 , 151 L.Ed.2d 142 (2001); DeBauche v. Trani, 191 F.3d 499, 506-09 (4th Cir.1999).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jackson
(2×)
United States v. Kelley, 140 F.3d 596, 604 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 908 , 119 S.Ct. 247 , 142 L.Ed.2d 203 (1998) (holding that the good faith exception insulated a search pursuant to an unsigned and undated warrant where the issuing authority communicated in person to the affiant that a finding of probable cause had been made); United States v. Diaz-Lopez, No. 89-30270, 1990 WL 194268, at *1 (9th Cir. Dec.6, 1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 969 , 111 S.Ct. 1605 , 113 L.Ed.2d 667 (1991) (holding that the good faith exception insulated a search conducted pursuant to an unsigned search war…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Khalil v. Farash Corp.
See also Hack v. President and Fellows of Yale College, 237 F.3d 81, 88 (2d Cir.2000) (in order to state FHA claim based on disparate impact, plaintiffs must show that the identified policy, although adopted for neutral reasons, has a discriminatory impact on the availability of housing for the protected class, or the terms and conditions on which the housing is offered), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 888 , 122 S.Ct. 201 , 151 L.Ed.2d 142 (2001), abrogated on other grounds by Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N.A., 534 U.S. 506 , 122 S.Ct. 992 , 152 L.Ed.2d 1 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Twombly v. Bell Atlantic Corp.
See, e.g., Todd, 275 F.3d at 200 (“To survive a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss [in a Section 1 case], an alleged product market must [inter alia ] ... be ‘plausible.’ ” (citing Hack v. President & Fellows of Yale Coll., 237 F.3d 81 , 86 (2d Cir.2000), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 888 , 122 S.Ct. 201 , 151 L.Ed.2d 142 (2001))); see also DM Research, Inc. v. College of American Pathologists, 170 F.3d 53, 56 (1st Cir.1999) (affirming dismissal where, “without more detail, it is highly implausible to suppose that [one of the defendants] or its members ha[d] any reason to ‘agree’ with” t…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
William Twombly v. Bell Atlantic Corporation
See, e.g., Todd, 275 F.3d at 200 ("To survive a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss [in a Section 1 case], an alleged product market must [ inter alia ] . . . be `plausible.'" (citing Hack v. President & Fellows of Yale Coll., 237 F.3d 81 , 86 (2d Cir.2000), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 888 , 122 S.Ct. 201 , 151 L.Ed.2d 142 (2001))); see also DM Research, Inc. v. College of American Pathologists, 170 F.3d 53, 56 (1st Cir.1999) (affirming dismissal where, "without more detail, it is highly implausible to suppose that [one of the defendants] or its members ha[d] any reason to `agree' with" the other defen…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
King v. Town of Wallkill
See, e.g., Mazza v. Bratton, 108 F.Supp.2d 167, 175 (S.D.N.Y.2000) (“An individual is not qualified for his position if he is unable to come to work.”), aff'd, 9 Fed.Appx. 36 (2d Cir.2001), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 887 , 122 S.Ct. 199 , 151 L.Ed.2d 140 (2001).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Khalil v. Farash Corp.
See also Hack v. President and Fellows of Yale College, 237 F.3d 81, 88 (2d Cir.2000) (in order to state FHA claim based on disparate impact, plaintiffs must show that the identified policy, although adopted for neutral reasons, has a discriminatory impact on the availability of housing for the protected class, or the terms and conditions on which the housing is offered), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 888 , 122 S.Ct. 201 , 151 L.Ed.2d 142 (2001).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Milstead, Administrator of the Estate of Milstead
v.
Kibler
v.
Kibler
No. 01-50.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 1, 2001.
Published
C. A. 4th Cir. Certio-rari denied.