discussed Cited "see" Good v. BD. OF COUNTY COM'RS OF COUNTY OF SHAWNEE See Woods v. City of Chicago, 234 F.3d 979, 987 (7th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 955 , 122 S.Ct. 354 , 151 L.Ed.2d 268 (2001); United States v. Becker, 230 F.3d 1224, 1236 (10th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 1000 , 121 S.Ct. 1666 , 149 L.Ed.2d 647 (2001); United States v. Nieto, 60 F.3d 1464, 1468 (10th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1081 , 116 S.Ct. 793 , 133 L.Ed.2d 742 (1996); United States v. Freeman, 816 F.2d 558, 563 (10th Cir.1987); United States v. Rodriguez-Pando, 841 F.2d 1014, 1020 (10th Cir.1988).

discussed Cited "see, e.g." Lopez v. MNAF Pizzeria, Inc. Jan. 8, 2007); see also Woods v. City of Chicago, 234 F.3d 979, 988 (7th Cir. 2000) (“[A]t the summary judgment stage, the party seeking to offer the business record must attach an affidavit sworn to by a person who would be qualified to introduce the record as evidence at trial, for example, a custodian . . . .”), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 955 (2001).

discussed Cited "see, e.g." Jennifer Jones and Jamal Jones v. State of Indiana See also State v. Peterson, 273 Ga. 657 , 543 S.E.2d 692, 696 (2001) (where the court noted that an officer’s entry in the house for the purpose of seeing that the children who had been left without responsible adult supervision were cared for properly was not a violation of the residents’ Fourth Amendment rights), cert. denied 534 U.S. 955 , 122 S.Ct. 356 , 151 L.Ed.2d 269 (2001). [20] Upon review, we find Crabb and Holder inapposite to the facts at hand.

discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Workcuff See also United States v. Hendrixson, 234 F.3d 494, 496 (11th Cir.2000), ce rt. denied, 534 U.S. 955 , 122 S.Ct. 356 , 151 L.Ed.2d 269 (2001)(“to us, Wilson’s footnote suggests that evidence obtained by the police when the media is just present is not subject to the exclusionary rule, while it may remain an open question about whether evidence obtained by the media is subject to the exclusionary rule”).