Ray v. United States, 535 U.S. 980 (2002). · Go Syfert
Ray v. United States, 535 U.S. 980 (2002). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
26 citation events (26 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Johnson (iand, 2005-12-16)
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002 2014 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Johnson
N.D. Iowa · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Ray, 250 F.3d 596, 602 (8th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 980 , 122 S.Ct. 1459 , 152 L.Ed.2d 398 (2002); see also Preliminary “Penalty Phase” Jury Instruction No. 5 (“You must not take anything I said or did during the ‘merits phase’ of the trial or anything I may say or do during this ‘penalty phase’ as indicating what I think of the evidence or what I think the sentence on any of the Counts in question should be.”); Final “Penalty Phase” Jury Instruction No. 9 (“Let me remind you again that nothing that I have said in these instructions — and …
cited Cited "see" Harold Ray v. United States
8th Cir. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Ray, 250 F.3d 596, 599 (8th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 980 , 122 S.Ct. 1459 , 152 L.Ed.2d 398 (2002).
discussed Cited "see" Johnson v. Allstate Ins. Co.
Wash. Ct. App. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Skamania County v. Woodall, 104 Wash.App. 525 , 536 n. 11, 16 P.3d 701 , review denied, 144 Wash.2d 1021 , 34 P.3d 1232 (2001), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 980 , 122 S.Ct. 1459 , 152 L.Ed.2d 399 (2002); RAP 10.4(h).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Richard A. Oslund
8th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Ray, 250 F.3d 596, 602 (8th Cir. -8- 2001) (gaps in tape recording were not so substantial as to render entire recording untrustworthy and defendant could argue to jury that he was entrapped by informant into making incriminating statements), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 980 (2002); cf. Webster, 84 F.3d at 1065 (finding court did not abuse its discretion in admitting videotape where lens was partially obscured and did not cover all of the actions of those being recorded and the audio was partially unclear because the "infirmities are not so pervasive as to render the tape a…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Richard Ashton Oslund
8th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Ray, 250 F.3d 596, 602 (8th Cir.2001) (gaps in tape recording were not so substantial as to render entire recording untrustworthy and defendant could argue to jury that he was entrapped by informant into making incriminating statements), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 980 , 122 S.Ct. 1459 , 152 L.Ed.2d 398 (2002); cf. Webster, 84 F.3d at 1065 (finding court did not abuse its discretion in admitting videotape where lens was partially obscured and did not cover all of the actions of those being recorded and the audio was partially unclear because the “infirmities are not so p…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ray
v.
United States
01-8743.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 1, 2002.
535 U.S. 980
Published

535 U.S. 980

RAY
v.
UNITED STATES.

No. 01-8743.

Supreme Court of the United States.

April 1, 2002.

1

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 250 F. 3d 596.