green
Positive treatment
4.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Thomas
See United States v. Suarez, 263 F.3d 468, 484 (6th Cir.2001) (citation omitted), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 991 , 122 S.Ct. 1547 , 152 L.Ed.2d 472 (2002).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Sellers
See United States v. Roberts, 262 F.3d 286, 293 (4th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 991 , 122 S.Ct. 1548 , 152 L.Ed.2d 473 (2002).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Haley
See United States v. Roberts, 262 F.3d 286, 294 (4th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 991 , 122 S.Ct. 1548 , 152 L.Ed.2d 473 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Basim Omar Sabri
See United States v. Suarez, 263 F.3d 468, 489 (6th Cir. 2001) (stating that if the court were writing on a clean slate, it "might well agree that proper application of 18 U.S.C. § 666 requires a minimal nexus between the alleged criminal activity and the federal funding received pursuant to that statute," but in light of Dakota, it was bound to conclude that § 666 requires no nexus), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 991 (2002). 6 the Fifth Circuit.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Basim Omar Sabri
(2×)
See United States v. Suarez, 263 F.3d 468, 489 (6th Cir.2001) (stating that if the court were writing on a clean slate, it "might well agree that proper application of 18 U.S.C. § 666 requires a minimal nexus between the alleged criminal activity and the federal funding received pursuant to that statute," but in light of Dakota , it was bound to conclude that § 666 requires no nexus), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 991 , 122 S.Ct. 1547 , 152 L.Ed.2d 472 (2002). 5 The Fifth Circuit recently addressed the question of whether § 666 can be sustained as a condition on the receipt of federal funds.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Lott v. Trammell
See also Abshier, 2001 OK CR 13, ¶¶ 156-157 , 28 P.3d 579, 610 , cert. denied, 535 U.S. 991 , 122 S.Ct. 1548 , 152 L.Ed.2d 472 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lott v. State
(2×)
See also Abshier, 2001 OK CR 13 , ถถ 156-157, 28 P.3d 579, 610 , cert. denied, 535 U.S. 991 , 122 S.Ct. 1548 , 152 L.Ed.2d 472 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Khan
See, e.g., United States v. Roberts, 262 F.3d 286, 294 (4th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 991 , 122 S.Ct. 1548 , 152 L.Ed.2d 473 (2002); United States v. Harris, 39 F.3d 1262, 1267 (4th Cir.1994).
Esparaza-Gonzalez
v.
United States
v.
United States
01-7544.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 15, 2002.
Published
ESPARAZA-GONZALEZ ET AL.
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 01-7544.
Supreme Court of the United States.
April 15, 2002.
1
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 268 F. 3d 272.