green
Positive treatment
Trending · 75 recent citers
Quoted verbatim 1×
8.5 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“The language of paragraph (3)(B)(ii) is clear and unambiguous”
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 18 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Glover v. Glendening
the language of paragraph (3)(b)(ii) is clear and unambiguous
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Allridge v. Cockrell
At least two circuits have held that, “[a]b-sent an explicit statement by the district court, in cases where a district court grants a COA with respect to the merits of a constitutional claim but the COA is silent with respect to procedural claims that must be resolved if the panel is to reach the merits, [the court of appeals] will assume that the COA also encompasses any procedural claims that must be addressed on appeal.” Jones v. Smith, 231 F.3d 1227, 1231 (9th Cir.2000); McCoy v. United States, 266 F.3d 1245, 1248 (11th Cir. 2001) (quoting Jones), cert. denied, 536 U.S. 906 , 122 S.Ct…
discussed
Cited "see"
State Of Louisiana v. Jason Leon Griffin
See State v. Duncan, 99- 2615 ( La. 10/ 16/ 01), 802 So. 2d 533 , 549- 50, cert. denied, 536 U.S. 907 , 122 S. Ct. 2362 , 153 L.Ed.2d 183 ( 2002). 31 A thorough review of the record reveals the trial court, State, and defendant were all actively engaged in a full and complete voir dire.
cited
Cited "see"
State Of Louisiana v. Donovan Darville
See State v. Duncan, 99- 2615 ( La. 10/ 16/ 01), 802 So. 2d 533, 545 , cert. denied, 536 U.S. 907 , 122 S. Ct. 2362 , 153 L.Ed. 2d 183 ( 2002).
cited
Cited "see"
In re Weidenbenner
See Tyler v. Douglas, 280 F.3d 116, 123 (2d Cir.2001), cert. denied, 536 U.S. 906 , 122 S.Ct. 2361 , 153 L.Ed.2d 182 (2002).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Henderson
See State v. Duncan, 99-2615, p. 24 (La.10/16/01), 802 So.2d 533, 550 , cert. denied, 536 U.S. 907 , 122 S.Ct. 2362 , 153 L.Ed.2d 183 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see"
US Ex Rel. Underwood v. Genentech, Inc.
LEGAL STANDARDS A. Qui Tam Actions The False Claims Act imposes liability upon those who present to the Government — or cause to be presented — false or fraudulent claims for payment. 31 U.S.C. § 3729 (a)(1); see Hutchins v. Wilentz, 253 F.3d 176, 182 (3d Cir.2001) cert. denied, 536 U.S. 906 , 122 S.Ct. 2360 , 153 L.Ed.2d 182 (2002).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Prejean
See State v. Duncan, 99-2615, p. 14 (La. 10/16/01), 802 So.2d 533, 545 , cert. denied, 536 U.S. 907 , 122 S.Ct. 2362 , 153 L.Ed.2d 183 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hughes v. State
(2×)
See McCoy v. United States, 266 F.3d 1245, 1255-56 (11th Cir.2001) (deciding the retroactivity issue first because "if Apprendi does not apply retroactively, this alone resolves the case"), cert. denied, 536 U.S. 906 , 122 S.Ct. 2362 , 153 L.Ed.2d 183 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States Ex Rel. Campbell v. Lockheed Martin Corp.
See Hutchins v. Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, 253 F.3d 176 (3d Cir.2001) (holding that inflated legal bills submitted to Bankruptcy Court for payment from bankrupt estates administered by the United States trustee were not claims for government funds and thus there was no cause of action under False Claims Act), cert. denied, 536 U.S. 906 , 122 S.Ct. 2360 , 153 L.Ed.2d 182 (2002); United States ex rel.
cited
Cited "see"
Lombardo v. United States
See McCoy v. United States, 266 F.3d 1245, 1258 (11th Cir.2001), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 122 S.Ct. 2362 , 153 L.Ed.2d 183 (2002). 3 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Turpin v. Thoms
See McCoy v. United States, 266 F.3d 1245, 1258 (11th Cir.2001), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 122 S.Ct. 2362 , 153 L.Ed.2d 183 (2002); United States v. Moss, 252 F.3d 993, 997 (8th Cir.2001), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 122 S.Ct. 848 , 151 L.Ed.2d 725 (2002); United States v. Sanders, 247 F.3d 139, 146 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 122 S.Ct. 573 , 151 L.Ed.2d 445 (2001).
discussed
Cited "see"
Smith v. Snyder
See McCoy v. United States, 266 F.3d 1245, 1258 (11th Cir.2001), cert denied. — U.S. —, 122 S.Ct. 2362 , 153 L.Ed.2d 183 (2002); United States v. Moss, 252 F.3d 993, 997 (8th Cir.2001), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 122 S.Ct. 848 , 151 L.Ed.2d 725 (2002); United States v. Sanders, 247 F.3d 139, 146 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 122 S.Ct. 573 , 151 L.Ed.2d 445 (2001).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Matthew Henry
See, e.g., United States v. Haney, 264 F.3d 1161, 1170-71 (10th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 536 U.S. 907 , 122 S.Ct. 2362 , 153 L.Ed.2d 183 (2002); United States v. Franklyn, 157 F.3d 90, 93, 96-97 (2d Cir. 1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1112 , 119 S.Ct. 887 , 142 L.Ed.2d 786 (1999); United States v. Wright, 117 F.3d 1265 , 1267, 1270-71 (11th Cir.1997), vacated in part on rehearing on other grounds by United States v. Wright, 133 F.3d 1412 (11th Cir. 1998); United States v. Knutson, 113 F.3d 27, 31 (5th Cir.1997) (per curiam); United States v. Rybar, 103 F.3d 273, 284-85 (3d Cir.1996), cert. deni…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Joseph H. Fleischli
See also United States v. Haney, 264 F.3d 1161, 1166-71 (10th Cir.2001), cert. denied, - U.S.-, 122 S.Ct. 2362 , 153 L.Ed.2d 183 (2002) (upholding section 922(o) against a post- Morrison Commerce Clause challenge).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ovalle v. United States
Appx. 152 (6th Cir.2002) (unpublished opinion); see also, e.g., McCoy v. United States, 266 F.3d 1245, 1258 (11th Cir.2001), cert denied, — U.S.-, 122 S.Ct. 2362 , 153 L.Ed.2d 183 (2002); United States v. Moss, 252 F.3d 993, 997 (8th Cir.2001), cert, denied, — U.S.-, 122 S.Ct. 848 , 151 L.Ed.2d 725 (2002); United States v. Sanders, 247 F.3d 139, 146 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 122 S.Ct. 573 , 151 L.Ed.2d 445 (2001).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Evans
See, e.g., McCoy v. United States, 266 F.3d 1245, 1258 (11th Cir.2001), cert denied, — U.S. —, — S.Ct. —, 153 L.Ed.2d 183 , 2002 WL 1271048 (U.S. June 10, 2002); United States v. Moss, 252 F.3d 993 (8th Cir.2001), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 122 S.Ct. 848 , 151 L.Ed.2d 725 (2002); United States v. Sanders, 247 F.3d 139, 146-51 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 122 S.Ct. 573 , 151 L.Ed.2d 445 (2001); Levan v. United States, 128 F.Supp.2d 270, 275-76 (E.D.Pa.2001) (listing cases); but see United States v. Murphy, 109 F.Supp.2d 1059 (D.Minn.2000); Darity v. United States, 124 F.Supp…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Moreno v. Snyder
See Goode v. United States, 39 Fed.Appx. 152, at 155-158 (6th Cir.2002); see also, e.g., McCoy v. United States, 266 F.3d 1245, 1258 (11th Cir.2001), cert, denied, — U.S.-, 122 S.Ct. 2362 , 153 L.Ed.2d 183 , 2002 WL 1271048 (U.S. June 10, 2002); United States v. Moss, 252 F.3d 993, 997 (8th Cir.2001), cert, denied, -U.S.-, 122 S.Ct. 848 , 151 L.Ed.2d 725 (2002); United States v. Sanders, 247 F.3d 139, 146 (4th Cir.), cert, denied, — U.S.-, 122 S.Ct. 573 , 151 L.Ed.2d 445 (2001).
Osterback
v.
Ingram
v.
Ingram
01-7143.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 10, 2002.
Published
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of Maryland (1)
OSTERBACK
v.
INGRAM ET AL.
No. 01-7143.
Supreme Court of the United States.
June 10, 2002.
1
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 263 F. 3d 169.