Clark v. Moore, Sec'y, Florida Dep't of Corr., 536 U.S. 944 (2002). · Go Syfert
Clark v. Moore, Sec'y, Florida Dep't of Corr., 536 U.S. 944 (2002). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
30 citation events (30 in the last 25 years) across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Karger v. Wood (ncctapp, 2005-12-06)
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002 2014 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Karger v. Wood
N.C. Ct. App. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Carlton v. Carlton, 145 N.C.App. 252, 263 , 549 S.E.2d 916, 924 (Tyson, J., dissenting), rev'd per curiam per dissent, 354 N.C. 561 , 557 S.E.2d 529 (2001), cert. denied, 536 U.S. 944 , 122 S.Ct. 2630 , 153 L.Ed.2d 811 (2002) (noting the findings included within the order appealed from, considered together with the findings from a previous order, and "taken as a whole" sufficiently demonstrated the connection between the change in circumstances and the welfare of the child).
discussed Cited "see" Shipman v. Shipman
N.C. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See Carlton v. Carlton, 145 N.C.App. 252, 262 , 549 S.E.2d 916, 923 (Tyson, J., dissenting) (emphasizing the importance of a trial court's factual findings as to any effect that a change in circumstances might have on the minor child), rev'd per curiam per dissent, 354 N.C. 561 , 557 S.E.2d 529 (2001), cert. denied, 536 U.S. 944 , 122 S.Ct. 2630 , 153 L.Ed.2d 811 (2002); see also 3 Suzanne Reynolds, Lee's North Carolina Family Law § 13.103 (5th rev. ed. 2002) [hereinafter Lee's Family Law] (noting that the moving party must prove what the treatise author refers to as a "nexus" between the cha…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Clark
v.
Moore, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
01-9778.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 24, 2002.
536 U.S. 944
Published

536 U.S. 944

CLARK
v.
MOORE, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS.

No. 01-9778.

Supreme Court of the United States.

June 24, 2002.

1

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.