green
Positive treatment
4.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Devon Howard Toepfer
See United States v. Bender, 290 F.3d 1279, 1284 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1037 , 123 S.Ct. 571 , 154 L.Ed.2d 457 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Edward N. Holmes
See United States v. Dunnock, 295 F.3d 431, 435 (4th Cir.) (holding that knock and announce would have been futile when defendant received “functional equivalent of notice of authority and purpose” after police arrested and questioned him about whether he had a key to the door and whether anyone was inside), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1037 , 123 S.Ct. 570 , 154 L.Ed.2d 457 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Holmes, Edward N.
See United States v. Dunnock, 295 F.3d 431, 435 (4th Cir.) (holding that knock and announce would have been futile when defendant received ‘‘functional equiva- lent of notice of authority and purpose’’ after police arrested and questioned him about whether he had a key to the door and whether anyone was inside), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1037 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Monreal-Miranda
See United States v. Carranza, 289 F.3d 634, 641 (9th Cir.2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1037 , 123 S.Ct. 572 , 154 L.Ed.2d 458 (2002). 2 There is suffi dent evidence to support a conviction if, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Hardin
See United States v. Carranza, 289 F.3d 634, 641-42 (9th Cir.2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1037 , 123 S.Ct. 572 , 154 L.Ed.2d 458 (2002).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Long
See United States v. Carranza, 289 F.3d 634, 641-42 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1037 , 123 S.Ct. 572 , 154 L.Ed.2d 458 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Harwell
See, e.g., United States v. Dunnock, 295 F.3d 431, 435 (4th Cir.) (knock and announce would have been “futile” when the defendant had been arrested outside his home and received the “functional equivalent of notice of authority and purpose” when he refused to give officers a key to the front door), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1037 , 123 S.Ct. 570 , 154 L.Ed.2d 457 (2002); cf. United States v. Holmes, 387 F.3d 903, 905 (D.C.Cir.2004) (implied recognition of functional equivalence/futility exception when officers arrive on scene as the defendant is unlocking his door, announce themselves and …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Fareed
v.
United States
v.
United States
02-6856.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 18, 2002.
Published
FAREED
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 02-6856.
Supreme Court of United States.
November 18, 2002.
1
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT.
2
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 296 F. 3d 243.