May v. United States, 537 U.S. 1136 (2003). · Go Syfert
May v. United States, 537 U.S. 1136 (2003). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
24 citation events (24 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Jones (ca4, 2003-09-12)
Treatment trajectory · 2003 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2003 2014 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Jones
4th Cir. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Ceballos, 302 F.3d 679, 690-92 (7th Cir.2002) (panel opinion overruling Lawuary’s footnote statement that § 851(a)’s requirements are jurisdictional and cannot be waived, because that statement was based on circuit precedent unsupported by reasoning), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1136 , 1137, 123 S.Ct. 924 , 925, 154 L.Ed.2d 829 , 830 (2003), and — U.S. -, 123 S.Ct. 1571 , 155 L.Ed.2d 318 (2003); United States v. Mooring, 287 F.3d 725, 727 (8th Cir.2002) (concluding that § 851(a)’s requirements are not jurisdictional); Prou v. United States, 199 F.3d 37, 43-46 (1st Cir…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Gray
N.D. Ohio · 2005 · signal: see also · confidence low
Because Malcolm had authority to approve interception applications under Section 2516(1), he “is presumed to have properly exercised that power and the condition[s] precedent [are] presumed to have been met unless the defendants offer evidence, apart from mere conjecture or speculation, to rebut this presumption.” See United States v. O’Connell, 841 F.2d 1408 , 1416 (8th Cir.1988) (internal quotation marks omitted), cert. denied, 487 U.S. 1210 , 108 S.Ct. 2857 , 101 L.Ed.2d 893 (1988); see also United States v. Ceballos, 302 F.3d 679, 685 (7th Cir.2002) (holding that defendant failed to …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
May
v.
United States
02-7644.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 13, 2003.
537 U.S. 1136
Published

537 U.S. 1136

MAY
v.
UNITED STATES.

No. 02-7644.

Supreme Court of United States.

January 13, 2003.

1

CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT.

2

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 43 Fed. Appx. 681.