Swartz v. Schering-Plough Corp., 539 U.S. 953 (2003). · Go Syfert
Swartz v. Schering-Plough Corp., 539 U.S. 953 (2003). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
17 citation events (17 in the last 25 years) across 9 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Erroll Flynn Shepard (ca8, 2006-09-11)
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Erroll Flynn Shepard
8th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Brown, 325 F.3d 1032, 1035 (8th Cir.2003) (weighing the third factor against the defendant where the defendant did not inquire about his case or request a speedy trial), cert. denied, 539 U.S. 953 , 123 S.Ct. 2632 , 156 L.Ed.2d 647 (2003).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Erroll Flynn Shepard, United States of America v. Tony Skannell, Also Known as Tomcat, United States of America v. Barry Renfold Cooley, United States of America v. Roy G. Straughan, Also Known as George Clark, Also Known as C-Note (3), Also Known as C-Nutt (3)
8th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Brown, 325 F.3d 1032, 1035 (8th Cir.2003) (weighing the third factor against the defendant where the defendant did not inquire about his case or request a speedy trial), cert. denied, 539 U.S. 953 , 123 S.Ct. 2632 , 156 L.Ed.2d 647 (2003). 60 The fourth factor, prejudice, is evaluated "in the light of the interests of defendants which the speedy trial right was designed to protect . . . (i) to prevent oppressive pretrial incarceration; (ii) to minimize anxiety and concern of the accused; and (iii) to limit the possibility that the defense will be impaired . . . the most se…
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Santiago
6th Cir. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hutchison v. Bell, 303 F.3d 720 , 748 n. 7 (6th Cir.2002)(claims inadequately briefed are deemed waived), cert. denied, 539 U.S. 944 , 123 S.Ct. 2608 , 156 L.Ed.2d 631 (2003); United States v. Layne, 192 F.3d 556, 566-67 (6th Cir.l999)(issues presented in “perfunctory manner, unaccompanied by some effort at developed argumentation” are deemed waived), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1029 , 120 S.Ct. 1443 , 146 L.Ed.2d 330 (2000); United States v. Watkins, 179 F.3d 489, 500-01 (6th Cir.1999)(appellant has “duty to point to the parts of the record that support his position and also to present a…
cited Cited "see" Triple 7, Inc. v. Intervet, Inc.
D. Neb. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See Dickson v. Microsoft Corp., 309 F.3d 193, 212 (4th Cir.2002), cert. denied, 539 U.S. 953 , 123 S.Ct. 2605 , 156 L.Ed.2d 647 (2003).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Swartz
v.
Schering-Plough Corp. Et Al.
02-1514.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 23, 2003.
539 U.S. 953
Breyer.
Published

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice Breyer took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.