green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
8.8 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 2003 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2003
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Jackson
the court failed to address that the tenmonth delay in rendering its opinion on the motion to suppress was approaching the point of being presumptively prejudicial.
discussed
Cited "see"
In the Matter of J.P.
See Commonwealth v. Evans, 439 Mass. 184, 191 , cert. denied, 540 U.S. 923 and 540 U.S. 973 (2003) (admission of identification hearsay evidence not prejudicial where cumulative of other properly admitted evidence). 11Even if Lee took the St.
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. DiCicco
See Commonwealth v. Evans, 439 Mass. 184, 204 , cert, denied, 540 U.S. 923 , and cert, denied, 540 U.S. 973 (2003).
cited
Cited "see"
Cahaly v. Benistar Property Exchange Trust Co.
See Commonwealth v. Evans, 439 Mass. 184, 203-204 , cert. denied, 540 U.S. 923 and 540 U.S. 973 (2003), citing Dirring v. United States, 353 F.2d 519, 520 (1st Cir. 1965).
discussed
Cited "see"
Guevara v. State
See Kavali v. State, No. 05-01-00835-CR, 2002 WL 31445280 , *4 (Tex.App.-Dallas Nov.4, 2002, pet. ref'd) (not designated for publication) (instruction included when a party is criminally responsible and quoted Family Code provision stating parent’s duty of “care, control and protection” of a child), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 967 , 124 S.Ct. 445 , 157 L.Ed.2d 313 (2003).
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Anderson
See Commonwealth v. Evans, 439 Mass. 184, 187 , cert. denied, 540 U.S. 923 , and 540 U.S. 973 (2003) (victim backed away from defendant with gun, fell, and crawled into a comer begging for his life); Commonwealth v. Doherty, supra. b.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gray
(2×)
See United States v. Radcliff, 331 F.3d 1153, 1162 (10th Cir.2003), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 973 , 124 S.Ct. 446 , 157 L.Ed.2d 323 (2003); S.Rep.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Scott Allen McDaniel (03-1940) and Gregory Warren Wade (03-2073)
See United States v. Stines, 313 F.3d 912, 917 (6th Cir.2002) (concluding that claims based on Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 , 120 S.Ct. 2348 , 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), had not been waived, explaining that “[i]t would have been impossible for the defendants to have intentionally relinquished or abandoned their Apprendi claims considering Apprendi was decided after they were sentenced”), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 973 , 124 S.Ct. 447 , 157 L.Ed.2d 323 (2003).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Wade
See United States v. Stines, 313 F.3d 912, 917 (6th Cir. 2002) (concluding that claims based on Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), had not been waived, explaining that “[i]t would have been impossible for the defendants to have intentionally relinquished or abandoned their Apprendi claims considering Apprendi was decided after they were sentenced”), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 973 (2003).
cited
Cited "see"
Sherrill v. Commandant, USDB
See Roberts v. Callahan, 321 F.3d 994, 995 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 973 , 124 S.Ct. 447 , 157 L.Ed.2d 323 (2003).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Moore
See United States v. Joseph, 333 F.3d 587, 589 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 973 , 124 S.Ct. 446 , 157 L.Ed.2d 322 (2003).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bozicevich v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
Federal courts “will not review petitioners’ claims on the merits if they were not raised at all in the military courts.” Watson v. McCotter, 782 F.2d 143, 145 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1184 (1986); see also Roberts v. Callahan, 321 F.3d 994, 995 (10th Cir. 2003) (“[I]f a ground for relief was not raised in the military courts, then the district court must deem that ground waived.”), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 973 (2003).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Chapman v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II
Furthermore, federal courts “will not review petitioners’ claims on the merits if they were not raised at all in the military courts.” Watson, 782 F.2d at 145 ; see also Roberts v. Callahan, 321 F.3d 994, 995 (10th Cir. 2003) (“if a ground for relief was not raised in the military courts, then the district court must deem that ground waived.”), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 973 (2003).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Honken
See, e.g., United States v. Joseph, 333 F.3d 587, 591 (5th Cir.) (“The district court is required to state, outside the presence of the jury, the reasons for which it has chosen to shackle the defendant.”), cert, denied, 540 U.S. 973 , 124 S.Ct. 446 , 157 L.Ed.2d 322 (2003); United States v. Durham, 287 F.3d 1297, 1305 (11th Cir.2002) (“[T]he district court is required to place the reasons for its decision to use such [security] measures on the record.”). *1031 ii.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Evans
v.
Massachusetts
v.
Massachusetts
03-6255.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 20, 2003.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Sixth Circuit (1)
EVANS
v.
MASSACHUSETTS.
No. 03-6255.
Supreme Court of United States.
October 20, 2003.
1
Appeal from the Sup. Jud. Ct. Mass.
2
Certiorari denied. Reported below: 439 Mass. 184, 786 N. E. 2d 375.