green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
2.7 score
“the sixth amendment guarantees a criminal defendant an effective advocate, not necessarily the advocate of his or her choosing.”
Treatment trajectory · 2005 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2005
2015
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Stein
the sixth amendment guarantees a criminal defendant an effective advocate, not necessarily the advocate of his or her choosing.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Terrell v. Kickbush
Apr. 29, 1998) overruled in part on other grounds by Malloy (“There is not now and never has been a right v. Hogan, 378 U.S. 1 (1964)); see also United guaranteed in the federal Constitution that a States v. Jones, 381 F.3d 114 , 121 (2d Cir. defendant be present at sidebar voir dire.” 2004), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1072 (2005); (citation omitted)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kotler v. Woods
The defendant’s right to be present at trial is also implicated by the fair trial concerns of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments, as they require a criminal defendant’s presence “ ‘to the extent that a fair and just hearing would be thwarted by his absence, and to that extent only.’” United States v. Gagnon, 470 U.S. 522, 526 , 105 S.Ct. 1482 , 84 L.Ed.2d 486 (1985) (quoting Snyder v. Massachusetts, 291 U.S. 97, 108 , 54 S.Ct. 330 , 78 L.Ed. 674 (1934), overruled in part on other grounds by Malloy v. Hogan, 378 U.S. 1 , 84 S.Ct. 1489 , 12 L.Ed.2d 653 (1964), and citing Faretta v. …
Solis Gonzalez
v.
United States
v.
United States
04-7277.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 10, 2005.
Published
Citer courts: S.D. New York (1)
SOLIS GONZALEZ
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 04-7277.
Supreme Court of United States.
January 10, 2005.
1
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 104 Fed. Appx. 692.