Oregon v. Guzek, 546 U.S. 1026 (2005). · Go Syfert
Search
Oregon v. Guzek, 546 U.S. 1026 (2005). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 2007 · …it is well established in this circuit that where mail fraud is the predicate act for a civil rico claim, the proximate cause element articulated in holmes requires the plaintiff to show reasonable reliance. ⚠ not in text
3 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Brown v. Cassens Transport Co. (ca6, 2007-07-10)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Brown v. Cassens Transport Co. (2×)
6th Cir. · 2007 · quote attribution · 2 verbatim quotes · confidence low
it is well established in this circuit that where mail fraud is the predicate act for a civil rico claim, the proximate cause element articulated in holmes requires the plaintiff to show reasonable reliance.
cited Cited "see" Voda v. Cordis Corp.
W.D. Okla. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bank of China v. NBM LLC, 359 F.3d 171 , 182 n. 13 (2d Cir.2004), cert. dismissed, 546 U.S. 1026 , 126 S.Ct. 675 , 163 L.Ed.2d 545 (2005).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Oregon
v.
Guzek
No. 04-928.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 23, 2005.
546 U.S. 1026
Published
1 passages pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 67%
Citer courts: Sixth Circuit (2)

Sup. Ct. Ore. [Certiorari granted, 544 U. S. 998.] Further consideration of respondent’s motion to dismiss petition for writ of certiorari as improvidently granted deferred to the hearing of the case on the merits.