green
Positive treatment
10.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 2006 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2006
2016
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Flomo v. Commissioner of Correction
See State v. West , 274 Conn. 605 , 622 n.26, 877 A.2d 787 , cert. denied, 546 U.S. 1049 , 126 S.Ct. 775 , 163 L.Ed.2d 601 (2005) ; State v. Moore , 293 Conn. 781 , 784 n.2, 981 A.2d 1030 (2009), cert. denied, 560 U.S. 954 , 130 S.Ct. 3386 , 177 L.Ed.2d 306 (2010).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Collymore
See State v. West , 274 Conn. 605 , 624-25, 877 A.2d 787 ("[t]he federal constitution require[s] that criminal defendants be afforded a meaningful opportunity to present a complete defense ... [which is] in plain terms the right to ... present the defendant's version of the facts as well as the prosecution's to the jury so that it may decide where the truth lies" [internal quotation marks omitted] ), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 1049 , 126 S.Ct. 775 , 163 L.Ed.2d 601 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Jones
See State v. West, 274 Conn. 605, 650 , 877 A.2d 787 (‘‘the primary if not exclusive purpose of jury privacy and secrecy is to protect the jury’s deliberations from improper influence’’ [internal quotation marks omit- ted]), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 1049 , 126 S. Ct. 775 , 163 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. James
See State v. West, 274 Conn. 605, 626-27 , 877 A.2d 787 (court properly excluded unidentified latent prints as evidence of third party perpetrator where prints located at periphery of crime scene, nothing in record indicated when prints placed relative to commission of offenses and nothing linked prints to particular individual or class of individuals), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 1049 , 126 S. Ct. 775 , 163 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Watson v. Commissioner of Correction
See State v. West, 274 Conn. 605 , 623 n.27, 877 A.2d 787 , cert. denied, 546 U.S. 1049 , 126 S. Ct. 775 , 163 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Lemay
See State v. West, 274 Conn. 605, 625 , 877 A.2d 787 (not enough to show another had motive to commit crime), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 1049 , 126 S. Ct. 775 , 163 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Ritrovato
We therefore disagree with the state’s claim that the more detailed testimony would have been “highly prejudicial evidentiary overkill.” Finally, the proffered testimony did not constitute inadmissible extrinsic evidence of a collateral matter, as suggested by the state as an alternative ground for affirming the Appellate Court’s judgment; see State v. West, 274 Conn. 605, 640 , 877 A.2d 787 (“[a] witness may not be impeached by contradicting his or her testimony as to collateral matters, that is, matters that are not directly relevant and material to the merits of the case” [inter…
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Galarza
See State v. West, 274 Conn. 605, 625 , 877 A.2d 787 (not enough to show another had motive to commit crime), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 1049 , 126 S. Ct. 775 , 163 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Myers
(2×)
Although exclusionary rules of evidence cannot be applied mechanistically to deprive a defendant of his rights, the constitution does not require that a defen- dant be permitted to present every piece of evidence he wishes.’’ (Footnote added; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Andrews, 313 Conn. 266, 275, 96 A.3d 1199 (2014); see also State v. West, 274 Conn. 605, 622–23 n.26, 877 A.2d 787 (right to present defense is based on sixth amendment principles and applicable to states through due process clause of fourteenth amendment), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 1049, 126 S. Ct. 775, 163 …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Simmons
Compare State v. West, 274 Conn. 605 , 626–27, 877 A.2d 787 (unidentified latent finger and palm prints found at periphery of crime scene lacked direct connection to crimes), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 1049 , 126 S. Ct. 775 , 163 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Ashby
Evidence that [raises] only a bare suspicion that a third party, rather than the defendant, committed the charged offense [is not] relevant to the jury’s determination.’’ (Internal quota- tion marks omitted.) State v. Schovanec, supra, 326 Conn. 319 ; see also State v. Baltas, 311 Conn. 786 , 810, 91 A.3d 384 (2014) (‘‘in explaining the requirement that the proffered evidence establish a direct connection to a third party, rather than raise merely a bare suspicion regarding a third party, we have stated [that] [s]uch evidence is relevant, exculpatory evidence, rather than merely tenu…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Watson
See, e.g., State v. West, 274 Conn. 605, 630 , 877 A.2d 787 , cert. denied, 546 U.S. 1049 , 126 S. Ct. 775 , 163 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Manousos
See, e.g., State v. West , 274 Conn. 605 , 622, 626-27, 877 A.2d 787 (trial court's ruling that unidentifiable fingerprints were inadmissible did not violate defendant's constitutional right to present defense), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 1049 , 126 S.Ct. 775 , 163 L.Ed.2d 601 (2005) ; State v. Cerreta , 260 Conn. 251 , 259-63, 796 A.2d 1176 (2002) (trial court's exclusion of exculpatory hair and fingerprint evidence violated the defendant's constitutional right to present defense); State v. Carter , 228 Conn. 412 , 416-17, 426-27, 636 A.2d 821 (1994) (trial court's exclusion of victim's criminal …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Skakel v. Commissioner of Correction
See, e.g., State v. West, 274 Conn. 605, 626 , 877 A.2d 787 (trial court has discretion to decide whether to admit third-party culpability evidence at trial), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 1049 , 126 S. Ct. 775 , 163 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Skakel v. Comm'r of Corr.
See, e.g., State v. West , 274 Conn. 605 , 626, 877 A.2d 787 (trial court has discretion to decide whether to admit third-party culpability evidence at trial), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 1049 , 126 S.Ct. 775 , 163 L.Ed.2d 601 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Faison
It follows, then, that the right to present a defense “does not include a right to present evidence that properly is excluded under the rules of evidence.” State v. Sun, 92 Conn. App. 618, 629 , 886 A.2d 1227 (2005); see also State v. West, 274 Conn. 605, 625 , 877 A.2d 787 (constitution does not require defendant be permitted to present “ ‘every piece of evidence he wishes’ ”), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 1049 , 126 S. Ct. 775 , 163 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Price
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 05-7176.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 28, 2005.
Published
C. A. 11th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.