green
Positive treatment
5.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 2007 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2007
2016
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Cohen v. United States
But see Henderson v. Shinseki 589 F.3d 1201, 1215-16 (Fed.Cir.2009) (“The ‘re-enactment rule’ delineated in Lorillard does not establish congressional acquiescence in all situations.”) (citing Coke v. Long Island Care at Home, Ltd., 376 F.3d 118 , 130 n. 5 (2d Cir.2004), vacated and remanded on other grounds, 546 U.S. 1147 , 126 S.Ct. 1189 , 163 L.Ed.2d 1125 (2006)), rev’d on other grounds, — U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 1197 , 179 L.Ed.2d 159 (2011).
discussed
Cited "see"
Intermountain Insurance Service of Vail, Ltd. Liability Co. v. Commissioner
(2×)
See generally Coke v. Long Island Care at Home, Ltd ., 376 F.3d 118 , 127-129 (2d Cir. 2004) (describing the problem and considering legislative history in both steps, but "without attaching primacy" in step one), vacated 546 U.S. 1147 , 126 S. Ct. 1189 , 163 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Mizrahi v. Gonzales
See Coke v. Long Island Care at Home, Ltd., 376 F.3d 118 , 127 & n. 3 (2d Cir.2004), vacated on other grounds, 546 U.S. 1147 , 126 S.Ct. 1189 , 163 L.Ed.2d 1125 (2006).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Henderson v. Shinseki
(2×)
See, e.g., Coke v. Long Island Care At Home, Ltd., 376 F.3d 118 , 130 n. 5 (2d Cir.2004) (discussing the limitations on the congressional acquiescence argument, "affectionately known as the `dog didn't bark canon'"), vacated and remanded on other grounds, 546 U.S. 1147 , 126 S.Ct. 1189 , 163 L.Ed.2d 1125 (2006).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Bugenig
v.
Hoopa Valley Tribe
v.
Hoopa Valley Tribe
No. 05M46.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 23, 2006.
Published
Motion for leave to file petition for writ of certiorari to the Hoopa Valley Tribal Court of Appeals denied.