Harris v. Louisiana, 546 U.S. 848 (2005). · Go Syfert
Search
Harris v. Louisiana, 546 U.S. 848 (2005). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
219 citation events (219 in the last 25 years) across 8 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Sarsour v. Trump (vaed, 2017-03-24)
Treatment trajectory · 2005 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2005 2015 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) Sarsour v. Trump
E.D. Va. · 2017 · confidence medium
District courts are fully capable of adjusting preliminary relief to take account of genuine changes in constitutionally significant conditions.” McCreary, 546 U.S. at 848, 125 S.Ct. 2722 .
discussed Cited "see" State v. Hernandez Herrera (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2026 · signal: see · confidence high
By so doing, he not only preserved the arguments now raised on appeal; see State v. Colon, 272 Conn. 106 , 363 n.146, 864 A.2d 666 (2004) (claim was adequately preserved because it was raised in motion for mistrial), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 848 , 126 S. Ct. 102 , 163 L.
cited Cited "see" State Of Louisiana v. Tierre O. Ramsey
La. Ct. App. · 2024 · signal: see · confidence high
P. art. 712; see State v. Harris, 2001- 2730 ( La. 1/ 19/ 05), 892 So. 2d 1238 , 1252- 53, cert. denied, 546 U.S. 848 , 126 S. Ct. 102 , 163 L.Ed.2d 116 ( 2005).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Jones
Conn. App. Ct. · 2019 · signal: accord · confidence high
"Generally, a [criminal] defendant is not entitled to an instruction singling out any of the state's witnesses *761 and highlighting his or her possible motive for testifying falsely." State v. Ortiz , 252 Conn. 533 , 561, 747 A.2d 487 (2000) ; accord State v. Colon , 272 Conn. 106 , 227, 864 A.2d 666 (2004), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 848 , 126 S.Ct. 102 , 163 L.Ed.2d 116 (2005).
discussed Cited "see" Dubinsky v. Black
Conn. App. Ct. · 2018 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Colon , 272 Conn. 106 , 152 n.15, 864 A.2d 666 (2004) ("the police had probable cause to arrest the defendant as a result of the statement of the victim's sister" who witnessed the crime), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 848 , 126 S.Ct. 102 , 163 L.Ed.2d 116 (2005) ; see also Iocovello v. City of New York , 701 Fed.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Salmond
Conn. App. Ct. · 2018 · signal: accord · confidence high
"Generally, a [criminal] defendant is not entitled to an instruction singling out any of the state's witnesses and highlighting his or her possible motive for testifying falsely." State v. Ortiz , supra, 252 Conn. at 561 , 747 A.2d 487 ; accord State v. Colon , 272 Conn. 106 , 227, 864 A.2d 666 (2004), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 848 , 126 S.Ct. 102 , 163 L.Ed. 2d 116 (2005).
cited Cited "see" State v. O'Donnell
Conn. App. Ct. · 2017 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Colon , 272 Conn. 106 , 265, 864 A.2d 666 (2004), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 848 , 126 S.Ct. 102 , 163 L.
cited Cited "see" State v. Daniel B.
Conn. App. Ct. · 2016 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Colon, 272 Conn. 106, 256 , 864 A.2d 666 (2004), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 848 , 126 S. Ct. 102 , 163 L.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Ferguson
La. Ct. App. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
Arizona v. Youngblood, 488 U.S. 51, 58 , 109 S.Ct. 333, 337 , 102 L.Ed.2d 281 (1988); see State v. Harris, 2001-2730 (La.1/19/05), 892 So,2d 1238, 1253, cert. denied, 546 U.S. 848 , 126 S.Ct. 102 , 163 L.Ed.2d 116 (2005).
cited Cited "see" State v. Santiago
Conn. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Colon, 272 Conn. 106, 383 , 864 A.2d 666 (2004), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 848 , 126 S. Ct. 102 , 163 L.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Baltas
Conn. · 2014 · signal: accord · confidence high
The trial court denied the defendant’s request to give a specific instruction on Rock’s credibility, but did pro- vide a general instruction to the jury on the credibility of witnesses.17 ‘‘Generally, a [criminal] defendant is not entitled to an instruction singling out any of the state’s witnesses and highlighting his or her possible motive for testifying falsely.’’ State v. Ortiz, 252 Conn. 533, 561 , 747 A.2d 487 (2000); accord State v. Colon, 272 Conn. 106, 227 , 864 A.2d 666 (2004), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 848 , 126 S. Ct. 102 , 163 L.
cited Cited "see" State v. Underwood
Conn. App. Ct. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Colon, 272 Conn. 106, 226-29 , 864 A.2d 666 (2004), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 848 , 126 S. Ct. 102 , 163 L.
cited Cited "see" State v. Gonzalez
Conn. App. Ct. · 2012 · signal: accord · confidence high
State v. Ortiz, [ 252 Conn. 533, 561 , 747 A.2d 487 (2000)]; accord State v. Colon, 272 Conn. 106, 227 , 864 A.2d 666 (2004), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 848 , 126 S. Ct. 102 , 163 L.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Miller
Conn. App. Ct. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Colon, 272 Conn. 106 , 154 n.26, 864 A.2d 666 (2004) (“[ajlthough the defendant’s brief adverts to independent rights under the [state] constitution, [when] no such arguments have been briefed . . . they are . . . deemed to have been waived” [internal quotation marks omitted]), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 848 , 126 S. Ct. 102 , 163 L.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Rizzo (2×)
Conn. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Colon, 272 Conn. 106, 319 , 864 A.2d 666 (2004) (rejecting claim that state constitution provides for right of allocution at capital sentencing hearing), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 848 , 126 S.Ct. 102 , 163 L.Ed.2d 116 (2005); State v. Rizzo, supra, at 223-24, 833 A.2d 363 (rejecting claim that state constitution requires jury instruction that, to impose penalty of death, aggravating factors must outweigh mitigating factors beyond reasonable doubt); State v. Ross, supra, 230 Conn. at 247-51 , 646 A.2d 1318 (rejecting claim that state constitution forbids imposition of death penalty un…
discussed Cited "see" Jasper v. Thaler
W.D. Tex. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See Rowell v. Dretke, 398 F.3d 370, 378 (5th Cir.) (“Circuit precedent has specifically rejected the argument that there is a constitutional requirement that mitigation special issue evidence be subject to appellate review by the state.”), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 848 , 126 S.Ct. 103 , 163 L.Ed.2d 117 (2005); Woods v. Cockrell, 307 F.3d 353, 359-60 (5th Cir.2002) (holding Texas Court of Criminal Appeals’ refusal to review the sufficiency of the evidence supporting negative answers to the Texas capital sentencing scheme’s “mitigation” special issue, i.e., the Penry issue, did not viol…
cited Cited "see" State v. Garcia
Conn. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See *56 State v. Colon, 272 Conn. 106, 188-91 , 864 A.2d 666 (2004), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 848 , 126 S. Ct. 102 , 163 L.
discussed Cited "see" Connecticut Coalition for Justice in Education Funding, Inc. v. Rell (2×)
Conn. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Colon, 272 Conn. 106, 320 , 864 A.2d 666 (2004), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 848 , 126 S. Ct. 102 , 163 L.
cited Cited "see" State v. McClelland
Conn. App. Ct. · 2009 · signal: accord · confidence high
Id., 56-57 ; accord State v. Colon, 272 Conn. 106, 264-65 , 864 A.2d 666 (2004), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 848 , 126 S. Ct. 102 , 163 L.
cited Cited "see" State v. Jason B.
Conn. App. Ct. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Colon, 272 Conn. 106, 368 , 864 A.2d 666 (2004), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 848 , 126 S. Ct. 102 , 163 L.
cited Cited "see" State v. Sulser
Conn. App. Ct. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Colon, 272 Conn. 106, 234 , 864 A.2d 666 (2004), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 848 , 126 S. Ct. 102 , 163 L.
discussed Cited "see" Edwards v. Commissioner of Correction
Conn. App. Ct. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Colon, 272 Conn. 106 , 153 n. 19, 864 A.2d 666 (2004) (“ [analysis, rather than mere abstract assertion, is required in order to avoid abandoning an issue by failure to brief the issue properly” [internal quotation marks omitted]), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 848 , 126 S. Ct. 102 , 163 L.
cited Cited "see" State v. Solomon
Conn. App. Ct. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Colon, 272 Conn. 106, 248-49 , 864 A.2d 666 (2004), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 848 , 126 S. Ct. 102 , 163 L.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Jacobson
Conn. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Colon, 272 Conn. 106, 187-88 , 864 A.2d 666 (2004) (when trial court reaches correct decision but on mistaken grounds, this court will sustain trial court’s action if proper grounds exist to support it), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 848 , 126 S. Ct. 102 , 163 L.
discussed Cited "see" Konigsberg v. BD. OF ALDERMEN OF NEW HAVEN
Conn. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
Ed. 2d 526 (2005); see State v. Colon, 272 Conn. 106, 215 , 864 A.2d 666 (2004) (“[o]nly in the most exceptional circumstances . . . will this court consider a claim that was not raised [in the trial court]” [internal quotation marks omitted]), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 848 , 126 S. Ct. 102 , 163 L.
examined Cited "see" State v. Flanagan (5×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
Conn. App. Ct. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Colon, 272 Conn. 106, 320-21 , 864 A.2d 666 (2004), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 848 , 126 S. Ct. 102 , 163 L.
cited Cited "see" State v. Schultz
Conn. App. Ct. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Colon, 272 Conn. 106 , 224 n.78, 864 A.2d 666 (2004), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 848 , 126 S. Ct. 102 , 163 L.
cited Cited "see" State v. Strich
Conn. App. Ct. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Colon, 272 Conn. 106, 407 , 864 A.2d 666 (2004) (Katz, J., dissenting), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 848 , 126 S. Ct. 102 , 163 L.
discussed Cited "see" State v. James P.
Conn. App. Ct. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
Although other cases have discussed the timeliness of a request to poll; see State v. Edelman, 64 Conn. App. 480, 482-84 , 780 A.2d 980 (2001), appeal dismissed, 262 Conn. 392 , 815 A.2d 104 (2003) ; or the definition of when a jury is “discharged”; see State v. Colon, 272 Conn. 106, 281-87 , 864 A.2d 666 (2004), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 848 , 126 S. Ct. 102 , 163 L.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Warholic
Conn. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Colon, 272 Conn. 106, 250-51 , 864 A.2d 666 (2004) (not improper for pros ecutor to characterize defendant’s testimony as he if based on evidence that would support inference that defendant was lying), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 848 , 126 S. Ct. 102 , 163 L.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Patterson
Conn. · 2005 · signal: accord · confidence high
“Generally, a [criminal] defendant is not entitled to an instruction singling out any of the state’s witnesses and highlighting his or her possible motive for testifying falsely.” State v. Ortiz, supra, 252 Conn. 561 ; accord State v. Colon, 272 Conn. 106, 227 , 864 A.2d 666 (2004), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 848 , 126 S. Ct, 102 , 163 L.
cited Cited "see" State v. Moyher
Conn. App. Ct. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Colon, 272 Conn. 106, 147 , 864 A.2d 666 (2004), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 848 , 126 S. Ct. 102 , 163 L.
cited Cited "see, e.g." State Of Louisiana v. Jermaine Williams
La. Ct. App. · 2023 · signal: see also · confidence low
P. art. 712; see also State v. Harris, 2001-2730 (La. 1/19/05), 892 So.2d 1238 , cert. denied, Harris v. Louisiana, 546 U.S. 848 , 126 S.Ct. 102 , 163 L.Ed.2d 116 (2005).
cited Cited "see, e.g." State v. P
Conn. · 2017 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Colon, 272 Conn. 106 , 322–24, 864 A.2d 666 (2004) (examining ‘‘right to be heard’’ in sentencing phase as right to counsel), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 848 , 126 S. Ct. 102 , 163 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Patel
Conn. · 2017 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., *1043 State v. Colon , 272 Conn. 106 , 322-24, 864 A.2d 666 (2004) (examining "right to be heard" in sentencing phase as right to counsel), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 848 , 126 S.Ct. 102 , 163 L.Ed.2d 116 (2005) ; State v. Wall , 40 Conn.App. 643 , 659, 673 A.2d 530 (examining right to speedy trial in sentencing), cert. denied, 237 Conn. 924 , 677 A.2d 950 (1996). 8 Nonetheless, it is clear that not all of the rights provided under article first, § 8, extend that far, as others are clearly pretrial rights, i.e., the right to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation.
cited Cited "see, e.g." State v. Santiago
Conn. · 2015 · signal: see also · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Rizzo, supra, 136 ; see also State v. Colon, 272 Conn. 106, 327 , 382–83, 864 A.2d 666 (2004), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 848 , 126 S. Ct. 102 , 163 L.
cited Cited "see, e.g." Anderson v. Commissioner of Correction
Conn. App. Ct. · 2014 · signal: see also · confidence low
Ed. 2d 876 (1992); see also State v. Colon, 272 Conn. 106, 218 , 864 A.2d 666 (2004), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 848 , 126 S. Ct. 102 , 163 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Jordan
Conn. · 2012 · signal: see also · confidence low
Additionally, the "proffering party bears the burden of establishing the relevance of the offered testimony." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Id.; see also State v. Colon, 272 Conn. 106, 198-99 , 864 A.2d 666 (2004) ("[o]ur law is clear that a defendant may introduce only relevant evidence, and, if the proffered evidence is not relevant, its exclusion is proper and the defendant's right [to present a defense] is not violated" [internal quotation marks omitted]), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 848 , 126 S.Ct. 102 , 163 L.Ed.2d 116 (2005).
cited Cited "see, e.g." State v. Langley
Conn. App. Ct. · 2011 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Colon, 272 Conn. 106 , 154 n.26, 864 A.2d 666 (2004), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 848 , 126 S. Ct. 102 , 163 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Motzer v. Haberli
Conn. · 2011 · signal: see also · confidence low
Whether an expert’s testimony is expressed in terms of a reasonable probability • • • does not depend [on] the semantics of the expert or his use of any particular term or phrase, but rather, is determined by looking at the entire substance of the expert’s testimony.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Marandino v. Prometheus Pharmacy, 294 Conn. 564,592 , 986 A.2d 1023 (2010); see also State v. Colon, 272 Conn. 106, 214 , 864 A.2d 666 (2004) (upholding exclusion of expert opinion when “[expert’s] answer would have been nothing more than speculation in that there was no foundat…
cited Cited "see, e.g." State v. Jay
Conn. App. Ct. · 2010 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Colon, 272 Conn. 106 , 154 n.26, 864 A.2d 666 (2004), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 848 , 126 S. Ct. 102 , 163 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Castillo
Conn. App. Ct. · 2010 · signal: see also · confidence low
While the court did not consider this exact issue, it did hold that [t]he instructions, read in their entirety, did not direct or advise the jury how to decide the matter . . . .” (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Santiago, supra, 17 Conn. App. 279 -80; see also State v. Colon, 272 Conn. 106 , 232 n.83, 234, 864 A.2d 666 (2004) (reasonable doubt charge in entirety not improper), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 848 , 126 S. Ct. 102 , 163 L.
cited Cited "see, e.g." State v. Flanagan
Conn. · 2009 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Colon, 272 Conn. 106 , 154 n.26, 864 A.2d 666 (2004), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 848 , 126 S. Ct. 102 , 163 L.
cited Cited "see, e.g." State v. Chimenti
Conn. App. Ct. · 2009 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Colon, 272 Conn. 106 ,154 n.26, 864 A.2d 666 (2004), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 848 , 126 S. Ct. 102 , 163 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Baptiste (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2009 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Colon, 272 Conn. 106 , 154 n.26, 864 A.2d 666 (2004), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 848 , 126 S. Ct. 102 , 163 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Perry
Conn. App. Ct. · 2008 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Colon, 272 Conn. 106 , 232-34 & 232 n.83, 864 A.2d 666 (2004) (rejecting constitutional challenge to instruction that reasonable doubt is “areal doubt, an honest doubt,” and a kind of doubt “that in the serious affairs that concern you, you would heed” [internal quotation marks omitted]), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 848 , 126 S. Ct. 102 , 163 L.
cited Cited "see, e.g." State v. Tok
Conn. App. Ct. · 2008 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Colon, 272 Conn. 106 , 154 n.26, 864 A.2d 666 (2004), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 848 , 126 S. Ct. 102 , 163 L.
cited Cited "see, e.g." State v. John F.M.
Conn. · 2008 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Colon, 272 Conn. 106, 303 , 864 A.2d 666 (2004) (interpretation of common law is question of law), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 848 , 126 S. Ct. 102 , 163 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." O'BRIEN v. Superior Court (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2008 · signal: see also · confidence low
See State v. Andrews, 248 Conn. 1, 19-20 , 726 A.2d 104 (1999) (“defense counsel’s failure to object to the prosecutor’s argument when it was made suggests that defense counsel did not believe that it was unfair in light of the record of the case at the time”); see also State v. Colon, 272 Conn. 106, 245 , 864 A.2d 666 (2004) (“defense counsel did not object to this line of questioning at trial on the basis of the attorney-client privilege, suggesting that he did not view the line of questioning to be seriously prejudicial at the time”), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 848 , 126 S. Ct. 102 …
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Davis
Conn. · 2007 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
This court consistently has held that this language is not constitutionally defective; see, e.g., State v. Colon, 272 Conn. 106 , 232-34 and n.83, 864 A.2d 666 (2004), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 848 , 126 S. Ct. 102 , 163 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Harris
v.
Louisiana
No. 04-10363.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 3, 2005.
546 U.S. 848
Cited by 4 opinions  |  Published

Sup. Ct. La. Certio-rari denied.