green
Positive treatment
3.6 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Markham Concepts v. Hasbro
See Pet. for Writ of Cert., Dastar Corp. v. Random House, Inc., No. 05-1259, 2006 WL 849912 at *i (Mar. 28, 2006), cert. denied, 548 U.S. 919 (June 26, 2006) (presenting the question of "[w]hether under the Copyright Act of 1909 a commissioning party is an 'employer' entitled to renew the copyright in a work for hire"). - 17 - and expense test, see M.G.B.
discussed
Cited "see"
Wilson v. Wilkinson
See United States v. Sczubelek, 402 F.3d 175 (3d Cir.2005)[, cert. denied, 548 U.S. 919 , 126 S.Ct. 2930 , 165 L.Ed.2d 977 (2006)]; Jones v. Murray, 962 F.2d 302 (4th Cir.1992)[, cert. denied, 506 U.S. 977 , 113 S.Ct. 472 , 121 L.Ed.2d 378 (1992)]; Groceman v. United States Dep’t of Justice, 354 F.3d 411 (5th Cir.2004); United States v. Kincade, 379 F.3d 813 (9th Cir.2004) [ (en banc), cert. denied, 544 U.S. 924 , 125 S.Ct. 1638 , 161 L.Ed.2d 483 (2005)]; Padgett v. Donald, 401 F.3d 1273 (11th Cir.)[, cert. denied sub nom.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
DASTAR CORP.
v.
RANDOM HOUSE, INC., ET AL.
v.
RANDOM HOUSE, INC., ET AL.
05-1259.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 26, 2006.
Published
Certiorari denied. THE CHIEF JUSTICE and JUSTICE BREYER took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.