green
Positive treatment
6.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 2007 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2007
2016
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
City of Corpus Christi v. Lora L. Portella
Co ., 426 F.3d 1304, 1314-15 (10th Cir. 2005) (holding that a private sector employee was required to cooperate with the EEOC in order to exhaust his administrative remedies); but see Doe v. Oberweis Dairy , 456 F.3d 704, 709-12 (7th Cir. 2006), cert. denied , 549 U.S. 1278 (2007) (concluding that a charging party's failure to cooperate with the EEOC's investigation did not block that investigation or a suit and noting that while "[t]he Tenth Circuit [in Shikles ] acknowledged the Supreme Court's admonition that no requirements beyond those in the statute should be imposed . . . it imposed the…
discussed
Cited "but see"
City of Corpus Christi v. Lora L. Portella
Co., 426 F.3d 1304, 1314-15 (10th Cir. 2005) (holding that a private sector em ployee was required to cooperate with the EEOC in order to exhaust his adm inistrative rem edies); but see Doe v. Oberweis Dairy, 456 F.3d 704, 709-12 (7th Cir. 2006), cert. denied, 549 U.S. 1278 (2007) (concluding that a charging party's failure to cooperate with the EEOC's investigation did not block that investigation or a suit and noting that while "[t]he Tenth Circuit [in Shikles] acknowledged the Suprem e Court's adm onition that no requirem ents beyond those in the statute should be im posed . . . it im posed…
examined
Cited "see"
Federal Trade Commission v. Mallett
(3×)
“To prove a deceptive act or practice in violation of Section 5(a) ..., the FTC must show: (1) a representation, omission, or practice that (2) is likely to mislead consumers acting reasonably under the circumstances, and that (3) the representation, omission, or practice is material.” FTC v. Cantkier, 767 F.Supp.2d 147, 151 (D.D.C.2011) (citations omitted); accord FTC v. Verity Int’l, Ltd., 443 F.3d 48 , 63 (2d Cir.2006), cert. denied, 549 U.S. 1278 , 127 S.Ct. 1868 , 167 L.Ed.2d 317 (2007).
cited
Cited "see"
Johnson v. State
See Drach v. Bruce, 281 Kan. 1058, 1067 , 136 P.3d 390 (2006), cert. denied 549 U.S. 1278 (2007).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ecology Center v. Castaneda
See Earth Island Inst. v. U.S. Forest Serv., 442 F.3d 1147 (9th Cir.2006), cert. denied, 549 U.S. 1278 , 127 S.Ct. 1829 , 167 L.Ed.2d 318 (2007); Lands Council I, 395 F.3d at 1036 ; Idaho Sporting Cong. v. Rittenhouse, 305 F.3d at 970.
discussed
Cited "see"
Wildwest Institute v. Castaneda
See Earth Island Inst. v. U.S. Forest Serv., 442 F.3d 1147 (9th Cir. 2006), cert. denied, 549 U.S. 1278 (2007); Lands Council I, 395 F.3d at 1036 ; Idaho Sporting Cong. v. Rittenhouse, 305 F.3d at 970.
discussed
Cited "see"
Ecology Center v. Castaneda
See Earth Island Inst. v. U.S. Forest Serv., 442 F.3d 1147 (9th Cir.2006), cert. denied, 549 U.S. 1278 , 127 S.Ct. 1829 , 167 L.Ed.2d 318 (2007); Lands Council I, 395 F.3d at 1036 ; Idaho Sporting Cong. v. Rittenhouse, 305 F.3d at 970.
discussed
Cited "see"
Wildwest Institute v. Castaneda
See Earth Island Inst. v. U.S. Forest Serv., 442 F.3d 1147 (9th Cir. 2006), cert. denied, 549 U.S. 1278 (2007); Lands Council I, 395 F.3d at 1036 ; Idaho Sporting Cong. v. 4454 WILDWEST INSTITUTE v. CASTANEDA Rittenhouse, 305 F.3d at 970.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Certain Land Situated in City of Detroit
(2×)
See Detroit International Bridge Co. v. United States, 549 U.S. 1278 , 127 S.Ct. 1813 , 167 L.Ed.2d 317 (2007).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Neighbors
See State v. Raskie, 293 Kan. 906, 925-26 , 269 P.3d 1268 (2012) (remanding because the district court made inadequate findings on defendant’s cruel and unusual punishment argument); see also Drach v. Bruce, 281 Kan. 1058, 1080 , 136 P.3d 390 (2006) (district court presumed to have made all necessary factual findings to support its judgment in the absence of an objection to inadequate findings), cert. denied 549 U.S. 1278 (2007).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
VERITY INTERNATIONAL, LTD., et al., petitioners,
v.
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION.
v.
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION.
06-669.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 19, 2007.
Cited by 11 opinions | Published
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.