green
Positive treatment
5.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 2007 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2007
2016
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Reyes v. North Texas Tollway Authority
See Bank of Louisiana v. Aetna U.S. Healthcare Inc., 468 F.3d 237, 241 (5th Cir.2006), cert. denied, 549 U.S. 1281 , 127 S.Ct. 1826 , 167 L.Ed.2d 322 (2007); CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Auburn Thirty Six, LLC, No. 4:12-CV-1984-JAR, 2014 WL 2480610 , at *3 (E.D.Mo.
cited
Cited "see"
Agd, L.P. and Anabell Cardona v. Quest Principal Investments, Inc., Juan Leal, Raul A. Pena, Md, Ruben Castilla and Rsra, L.P.
See Reynolds v. Murphy, 188 S.W.3d 252, 258 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2006, pet. denied) (op. on reh’g), cert. denied, 549 U.S. 1281 , (2007); see also TEX.
discussed
Cited "see"
Louis C. Barnes v. Charles Michael Athens
See Reynolds v. Murphy , 188 S.W.3d 252, 259 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2006, pet. denied) (holding that movant’s objections to competency of a nonmovant’s evidence that were filed the day of the summary judgment hearing were not untimely and could be considered and ruled upon by the trial court), cert. denied , 549 U.S. 1281 (2007); Shelton , 144 S.W.3d at 118–19 (holding that trial court was within its discretion to consider appellees’ objections to summary judgment evidence even though objections were filed two days before summary judgment hearing); see also Bradford Partners II, L.P. …
discussed
Cited "see"
Louis C. Barnes v. Charles Michael Athens
See Reynolds v. Murphy, 188 S.W.3d 252, 259 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2006, pet. denied) (holding that movant’s objections to competency of a nonmovant’s evidence that were filed the day of the summary judgment hearing were not untimely and could be considered and ruled upon by the trial court), cert. denied, 549 U.S. 1281 (2007); Shelton, 144 S.W.3d at 118–19 (holding that trial court was within its discretion to consider appellees’ objections to summary judgment evidence even though objections were filed two days before summary judgment hearing); see also 3 Bradford Partners II, L.P. v…
discussed
Cited "see"
Davina Kelly v. Church of God in Christ, Inc.
See Reynolds v. Murphy, 188 S.W.3d 252, 258 (Tex. App.––Fort Worth 2006, pet. denied) (op. on reh‘g), cert. denied, 549 U.S. 1281 (2007). 5 376 (Tex. App.––Beaumont 2002, no pet); see Limestone Prods.
discussed
Cited "see"
James Poag v. Kathy McCormick Flories
See id. (noting that when a deed is merely voidable, equity will not intervene because claimant has an adequate remedy at law); see also Slaughter v. Qualls, 139 Tex. 340, 345 , 162 S.W .2d 671, 674 (1942) (stating that four-year statute of limitations applies to deeds that are voidable). 8 The question of whether a deed is void or voidable depends on its effect upon the title at the time it was executed and delivered.
discussed
Cited "see"
Paciwest, Inc. v. Warner Alan Properties, LLC
Gamer v. Fidelity Bank, N.A., 244 S.W.3d 855, 859 (Tex.App.-Dallas 2008, no pet.); Bd. of Trustees of Fire and Police Retiree Health Fund v. Towers, Perrin, Forster & Crosby, Inc., 191 S.W.3d 185, 192-93 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 2005, pet. denied); see Reynolds v. Murphy, 188 S.W.3d 252, 259-61 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2006, pet. denied), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 127 S.Ct. 1839 , 167 L.Ed.2d 323 (2007).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bucio v. Sutherland
Diligence within the meaning of the “opening clause” of § 2254(e)(2) “depends upon whether the prisoner made a reasonable attempt, in light of the information available at the time, to investigate and pursue claims in state court; it does not depend ... upon whether those efforts could have been successful.” Williams, 529 U.S. at 435 , 120 S.Ct. 1479 ; see also Satterlee v. Wolfenbarger, 374 F.Supp.2d 562 (E.D.Mich.2005), aff'd & remanded on other grounds, 453 F.3d 362 (6th Cir.2006), cert. denied, 549 U.S. 1281 , 127 S.Ct. 1832 , 167 L.Ed.2d 322 (2007).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kevin TRUDEAU
v.
UNITED STATES
v.
UNITED STATES
No. 06-1012.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 19, 2007.
Published
No opinion found. Click here to view source material.