Doe v. United States, 127 S. Ct. 1910 (2007). · Go Syfert
Search
Doe v. United States, 127 S. Ct. 1910 (2007). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
32 citation events (32 in the last 25 years) across 9 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Browne (conn, 2009-05-26)
Treatment trajectory · 2007 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2007 2016 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" State v. Browne (2×)
Conn. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See Baranski v. Fifteen Unknown Agents of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco & Firearms, 452 F.3d 433, 440-41 (6th Cir. 2006) (“[b]y their terms, each of these requirements must be satisfied upon the ‘[issu- *730 anee]’ of the warrant”), cert. denied, 549 U.S. 1321 , 127 S. Ct. 1908 , 167 L.
examined Cited "see" State v. Browne (3×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2007 · signal: accord · confidence high
Groh , however, establishes no such rule." [7] (Citation omitted.) Id., at 471; accord Baranski v. Fifteen Unknown Agents, 452 F.3d 433 , 444 (6th Cir.2006) ("Groh did not establish a one-size-fits-all requirement that affidavits must accompany all searches to prevent a lawfully authorized search from becoming a warrantless one"), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 127 S.Ct. 1908 , 167 L.Ed.2d 565 (2007); United States v. Gamboa, 439 F.3d 796, 807 (8th Cir.) ("Groh did not rule upon the validity of a warrant that sufficiently incorporated a second document in order to meet the particularity requireme…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Graham v. Nelson
D. Minnesota · 2020 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See e.g., Baranski v. Fifteen Unknown Agents of Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, 452 F.3d 433 , 460 (6th Cir. 2006) (“Heck’s litigation bar applies with equal force to Bivens actions.”), cert. denied, 549 U.S. 1321 (2007); Washington v. Sorrows, 107 F.3d 876 (8th Cir. 1997) (unpublished per curiam) (same); Williams v. Hill, 74 F.3d 1339, 1340 (D.C.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Basic v. Siedel
D.N.D. · 2020 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See e.g., Baranski v. Fifteen Unknown Agents of Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, 452 F.3d 433 , 460 (6th Cir. 2006) (“Heck’s litigation bar applies with equal force to Bivens actions.”), cert. denied, 549 U.S. 1321 (2007); Washington v. Sorrows, 107 F.3d 876 (8th Cir. 1997) (unpublished per curiam) (same); Williams v. Hill, 74 F.3d 1339, 1340 (D.C.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
John DOE, On Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated
v.
UNITED STATES
No. 06-808.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 2, 2007.
127 S. Ct. 1910
Published

No opinion found. Click here to view source material.