green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
9.4 score
“when a civil rico action is brought in a district court where personal jurisdiction can be established over at least one defendant, summonses can be served nationwide on other defendants if required by the ends of justice.”
Treatment trajectory · 2007 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2007
2016
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Ross v. Jenkins
when a civil rico action is brought in a district court where personal jurisdiction can be established over at least one defendant, summonses can be served nationwide on other defendants if required by the ends of justice.
discussed
Cited "see"
Amanda Booker (Office of Child Support Southeast Region, Appellant) v. Cody Thomas
Instead, it chose a clear time limit for all parentage claims, and it is not for this Court to override that legislative decision by reading into § 402 “language that is not there.” Kerr, 143 Vt. at 605 , 470 A.2d at 674 ; see Miller-Jenkins v. Miller-Jenkins, 2006 VT 78, ¶ 52 , 180 Vt. 441 , 912 A.2d 951 (“We express, as many other courts have, a preference for legislative action.”), cert. denied, 550 U.S. 918 (2007).5 4 Further supporting this decision to reject OCS’s proffered best-interests exception, we note that parentage statutes must be “strictly construed” because they…
examined
Cited "see"
Republic of Iraq Ex Rel. Citizens of the Republic of Iraq v. ABB AG
(4×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
The Bateman Eichler Court traced the 12 "classic formulation" of the doctrine back to the eighteenth century. 472 U.S. at 306-07 & n.12; see, 13 e.g., Nisselson v. Lernout, 469 F.3d 143, 151 (1st Cir. 2006) (in pari delicto "has long been woven 14 into the fabric of federal law"), cert. denied, 550 U.S. 918 (2007).
examined
Cited "see"
Kennedy v. Allera
(3×)
See Nisselson v. Lemout, 469 F.3d 143, 150-51 (1st Cir.2006), cert. denied, 550 U.S. 918 , 127 S.Ct. 2131 , 167 L.Ed.2d 863 (2007); Fraternal Order of Police v. United States, 173 F.3d 898 , 904-05 (D.C.Cir.1999); New York v. EPA, 133 F.3d 987 , 992 (7th Cir.1998); see also 13B Charles Alan Wright, Arthur R.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rogers v. McDorman
(2×)
See O’Melveny & Myers v. FDIC, 512 U.S. 79 , 114 S.Ct. 2048 , 129 L.Ed.2d 67 (1994); see also Nisselson v. Lernout, 469 F.3d 143 , 154 & n. 3 (1st Cir. 2006) ("We look to state law to ascertain when wrongful conduct should be imputed to a corporation.”), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 127 S.Ct. 2131 , 167 L.Ed.2d 863 (2007).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hall v. County of Nemaha, Neb.
See, e.g., Hartsfield v. Colburn, 491 F.3d 394, 396 (8th Cir.2007) (applying the Eighth Amendment standard and holding that a delay of about 45 days in the treatment of a pretrial detainee’s significant and painful dental problems did not violate the Eighth Amendment despite the fact that the pretrial detainee twice requested treatment and was seen only after he threatened to file suit) (citing and quoting Butler v. Fletcher, 465 F.3d 340, 345 (8th Cir.2006), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 127 S.Ct. 2128 , 167 L.Ed.2d 863 (2007).) To prove an Eighth Amendment violation regarding denial of medic…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Alan NISSELSON, Trustee of the Dictaphone Litigation Trust
v.
Jo LERNOUT
v.
Jo LERNOUT
No. 06-1160.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 30, 2007.
Cited by 15 opinions | Published
Citer courts: D. Kansas (1)
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.