Shah v. New York State Dep't of Civil Serv., 177 L. Ed. 2d 1116 (2010). · Go Syfert
Search
Shah v. New York State Dep't of Civil Serv., 177 L. Ed. 2d 1116 (2010). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 4× by 2 distinct cases · “Congress may impose some limits on contributions to federal candidates and political parties because of the quid pro quo corruption or appearance of quid pro quo corruption that can be associated with such contributions.”
28 citation events (28 in the last 25 years) across 10 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Rufer v. Federal Election Commission (dcd, 2014-08-19)
Treatment trajectory · 2014 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2014 2020 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Rufer v. Federal Election Commission
D.D.C. · 2014 · signal: see also · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
congress may impose some limits on contributions to federal candidates and political parties because of the quid pro quo corruption or appearance of quid pro quo corruption that can be associated with such contributions.
discussed Cited "see" Wendy Wagner v. Federal Election Commission
D.C. Cir. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See Republican Nat’l Comm. v. FEC, 698 F.Supp.2d 150, 156 (D.D.C.), summ. aff'd, 561 U.S. 1040 , 130 S.Ct. 3544 , 177 L.Ed.2d 1119 (2010); Yamada v. Snipes, 786 F.3d 1182 , at 1205 & n. 17 (9th Cir.2015); Preston v. Leake, 660 F.3d 726, 734-35 (4th Cir.2011); Green Party of Conn. v. Garfield, 616 F.3d 189, 199 (2d Cir.2010).
discussed Cited "see" Maloney v. Singas (2×)
E.D.N.Y · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See Maloney v. Rice, 561 U.S. 1040 , 130 S.Ct. 3541 , 177 L.Ed.2d 1119 (2010).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Don Eugene Siegelman
11th Cir. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Siegelman, 561 F.3d 1215 (11th Cir.2009), 561 U.S. 1040 , 130 S.Ct. 3542 , 177 L.Ed.2d 1120 (2010); Scrushy v. United States, 561 U.S. 1040 , 130 S.Ct. 3541 , 177 L.Ed.2d 1120 (2010).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Bhupendra K. Shah
v.
New York State Department of Civil Service
No. 09-1042.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 28, 2010.
177 L. Ed. 2d 1116
Consideration, Took.
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 65%
Citer courts: District of Columbia (1)

Petition for rehearing denied.

Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

[*1117] Former decision, 559 U.S. 1116, 130 S. Ct. 2429, 176 L. Ed. 2d 941, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 3818.