green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
8.4 score
“when the contract's language is unambiguous it must be given its 'plain and ordinary' meaning and the court may not look to extrinsic evidence to interpret its provisions.”
Treatment trajectory · 2011 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2011
2018
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Universal Protection Service, Lp v. United States
when the contract's language is unambiguous it must be given its 'plain and ordinary' meaning and the court may not look to extrinsic evidence to interpret its provisions.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
In re: Michele Renee Clark
“An adversary proceeding is . . . part of the bankruptcy 4 but it is not the bankruptcy case itself, as illustrated by the 5 fact that the dismissal of an adversary proceeding is an 6 appealable final order even though the bankruptcy [main] case 7 continues.” United States v. Peel, 595 F.3d 763, 768-69 (7th 8 Cir. 2010), cert. denied, Peel v. United States, 131 S.Ct. 994 9 (2011) (citing Marchiando v. Illinois (In re Marchiando), 13 F.3d 10 1111, 1113-14 (7th Cir. 1994)).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
In re: Michele Renee Clark
“An adversary proceeding is . . . part of the bankruptcy 4 but it is not the bankruptcy case itself, as illustrated by the 5 fact that the dismissal of an adversary proceeding is an 6 appealable final order even though the bankruptcy [main] case 7 continues.” United States v. Peel, 595 F.3d 763, 768-69 (7th 8 Cir. 2010), cert. denied, Peel v. United States, 131 S.Ct. 994 9 (2011) (citing Marchiando v. Illinois (In re Marchiando), 13 F.3d 10 1111, 1113-14 (7th Cir. 1994)).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Rodriguez-Ramos
See United States v. Donnell, 596 F.3d 913, 924 (8th Cir.2010), cert. denied, Donnell v. United States, — U.S. —, 131 S.Ct. 994 , 178 L.Ed.2d 831 (2011).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. San-Miguel
(2×)
See United States v. Burrell, 622 F.3d 961, 965 (8th Cir.2010). "[B]efore an appellate court can correct an error not raised at trial, there must be (1) error, (2) that is plain, and (3) that affects substantial rights [and] (4) . . . seriously affects the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings." United States v. Donnell, 596 F.3d 913, 920 (8th Cir.2010) (quoting United States v. Pirani, 406 F.3d 543, 550 (8th Cir.2005)), cert. denied 562 U.S. ___ , 131 S.Ct. 994 , ___ L.Ed.2d ___ (2011).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Gary E. Peel
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 10-83.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 18, 2011.
178 L. Ed. 2d 825
Published
Citer courts: Federal Claims (1)
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Same case below, 595 F.3d 763.