green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
21.5 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 3 distinct cases, 2017–2020 ·
…here an appellate brief fails to provide any discussion of a claim with citation to relevant authority or fails to develop the issue in any other meaningful fashion capable of review, that claim is waived.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 2010 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2010
2018
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 21 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Com. v. Davis, T.
here an appellate brief fails to provide any discussion of a claim with citation to relevant authority or fails to develop the issue in any other meaningful fashion capable of review, that claim is waived.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Com. v. Ruggles, R.
here an appellate brief fails to provide any discussion of a claim with citation to relevant authority or fails to develop the issue in any other meaningful fashion capable of review, that claim is waived.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Angle, R. v. Smith, A.
here an appellate brief fails to provide any discussion of a claim with citation to relevant authority or fails to develop the issue in any other meaningful fashion capable of review, that claim is waived.
discussed
Cited "see"
Com. v. Gausman, B.
See Commonwealth v. Johnson, 604 Pa. 176, 191 , 985 A.2d 915, 924 (2009), cert. denied, 562 U.S. 906 , 131 S.Ct. 250 , 178 L.Ed.2d 165 (2010) (stating claim is waived where appellate brief does not include citation to relevant authority or fails to develop issue in any meaningful fashion capable of review). - 11 -
discussed
Cited "see"
Com. v. Delcamp, S.
See Taylor, supra. See also Commonwealth v. Johnson, 604 Pa. 176, 191 , 985 A.2d 915, 924 (2009), cert. denied, 562 U.S. 906 , 131 S.Ct. 250 , 178 L.Ed.2d 165 (2010) (stating claim is waived where appellate brief does not include citation to relevant authority or fails to develop issue in any meaningful fashion capable of review).
discussed
Cited "see"
Com. v. Woodbury, A
See Commonwealth v. Johnson, 985 A.2d 915, 924 (Pa. 2009) (“[W]here an appellate brief fails to provide any discussion of a claim with citation to relevant authority or fails to develop the issue in any other meaningful fashion capable of review, that claim is waived.”) (citation omitted), cert. denied, 562 U.S. 906 (2010); see also Commonwealth v. Murchinson, 899 A.2d 1159, 1160 (Pa. Super. 2006) (deeming appellant's claims waived under Pa.R.A.P. 2119(a) because he did not develop meaningful argument with specific references to relevant case law and to the record to support his claims); C…
discussed
Cited "see"
Sierra, A. v. Daneri, J.
See Pa.R.A.P. 2101. “[W]here an appellate brief fails to provide any discussion of a claim with citation to relevant authority or fails to develop the issue in any other meaningful fashion capable of review, that claim -8- J-S15040-20 is waived.” Commonwealth v. Johnson, 985 A.2d 915, 924 (Pa. 2009), cert. denied, 562 U.S. 906 (2010) (citations omitted).
cited
Cited "see"
Com. v. Brown, M.
See Commonwealth v. Johnson, 985 A.2d 915, 924 (Pa. 2009), cert. denied, 562 U.S. 906 (2010).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Charles Eagle Pipe
This process necessarily "use[d], as a reference, the criminal history category applicable to defendants whose criminal history or likelihood to recidivate most closely resembles that of the defendant's." USSG § 4A1.3(a)(4)(A) ; see United States v. Azure , 596 F.3d 449 , 454-55 (8th Cir.), cert. denied , 562 U.S. 906 , 131 S.Ct. 250 , 178 L.Ed.2d 165 (2010).
discussed
Cited "see"
Com. v. Eles, M.
See Commonwealth v. Johnson, 985 A.2d 915, 924 (Pa. 2009) (stating, “where an appellate brief fails to provide any discussion of a claim with citation to relevant authority or fails to develop the issue in any other meaningful fashion capable of review, that claim is waived.”), cert. denied, 562 U.S. 906 (2010). -2- J.
discussed
Cited "see"
Com. v. Work, D., Jr.
See Commonwealth v. Johnson, 604 Pa. 176 , 985 A.2d 915 (2009), cert. denied, 562 U.S. 906 , 131 S.Ct. 250 , 178 L.Ed.2d 165 (2010) (explaining appellant waives issue on appeal where he fails to present claim with citations to relevant authority or develop issue in meaningful fashion capable of review). -5- Circulated 07/10/2017 03:36 PM
discussed
Cited "see"
Com. v. Metz, C.
See Commonwealth v. Johnson, 604 Pa. 176 , 985 A.2d 915 (2009), cert. denied, 562 U.S. 906 , 131 S.Ct. 250 , 178 L.Ed.2d 165 (2010) (explaining appellant waives issue on appeal where he fails to present claim with citations to relevant authority or develop issue in meaningful fashion capable of review).4 To the extent Appellant claims the court relied primarily on Appellant’s prison tapes when it imposed an excessive sentence, his challenge implicates the discretionary aspects of sentencing.
discussed
Cited "see"
Com. v. Galli, H.
See Commonwealth v. Johnson, 604 Pa. 176 , 985 A.2d 915 (2009), cert. denied, 562 U.S. 906 , 131 S.Ct. 250 , 178 L.Ed.2d 165 (2010) (explaining appellant waives issue on appeal where he fails to present claim (Footnote Continued Next Page) -6- J-S19008-17 The Commonwealth further argues the forensic evidence presented at trial confirmed Victim ingested the poison while she was at Mr. Galli’s apartment on March 31, 2010.
discussed
Cited "see"
Com. v. Crumpler, L.
See Commonwealth v. Johnson, 604 Pa. 176 , 985 A.2d 915 (2009), cert. denied, 562 U.S. 906 , 131 S.Ct. 250 , 178 L.Ed.2d 165 (2010) (explaining appellant waives issue on appeal where he fails to present claim with citations to relevant authority or develop issue in meaningful fashion capable of review).
discussed
Cited "see"
Com. v. Elansari, A.
See Pa.R.A.P. 2101. “[W]here an appellate brief fails to provide any discussion of a claim with citation to relevant authority or fails to develop the issue in any other meaningful fashion capable of review, ____________________________________________ 2 The trial court did not order Appellant to file a concise statement of errors complained of on appeal, see Pa.R.A.P. 1925(b), nor did it author an opinion, see Pa.R.A.P. 1925(a). 3 “Because the constitutionality of a statute is a question of law, our standard of review is de novo and our scope is plenary.” Commonwealth v. Baker, 78 A.3d …
discussed
Cited "see"
Com. v. Jenkins, T.
See generally Commonwealth v. Johnson, 604 Pa. 176 , 985 A.2d 915 (2009), cert. denied, 562 U.S. 906 , 131 S.Ct. 250 , 178 L.Ed.2d 165 (2010) (explaining failure to provide discussion of claim with citation to relevant legal authority can constitute waiver of issue on appeal). -3- J-A03035-16 time it was taken and statement was verbatim contemporaneous recording of witness’ oral answers; thus, witness’ statement to police was admissible as prior inconsistent statement to impeach his credibility and as substantive evidence of matters asserted; detective took statement from witness, so detec…
discussed
Cited "see"
Com. v. Howard, M.
See generally Commonwealth v. Johnson, 985 A.2d 915, 924 (Pa. 2009), cert. denied, Johnson v. Pennsylvania, 562 U.S. 906 (2010). -9- J-S46009-15 and chose to credit Officer Sweeny’s testimony as to Johnson’s initial identification of Appellant to the police.
discussed
Cited "see"
Com. v. Seaton, D.
See Commonwealth v. Johnson, 985 A.2d 915, 924 (Pa. 2009) (stating, “where an appellate brief fails to provide any discussion of a claim with citation to relevant authority or fails to develop the issue in any other meaningful fashion capable of review, that claim is waived”), cert. denied, Johnson v. Pennsylvania, 562 U.S. 906 (2010).
discussed
Cited "see"
Com. v. Leonard, T.
See Commonwealth v. Johnson, 985 A.2d 915, 924 (Pa. 2009) (stating, “where an appellate brief fails to provide any discussion of a claim with citation to relevant authority or fails to develop the issue in any other meaningful fashion capable of review, that claim is waived”), cert. denied, Johnson v. Pennsylvania, 562 U.S. 906 (2010).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Com. v. Valdez, E.
See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Johnson, 985 A.2d 915 (Pa. 2009) (“[W]here an appellate brief fails to provide any discussion of a claim with citation to relevant authority or fails to develop the issue in any other meaningful fashion capable of review, that claim is waived.”), cert. denied, 562 U.S. 906 (2010); Pa.R.A.P. 2119(a). -8- J-S60003-15 Super. 2013) (quoting Commonwealth v. Ferguson, 893 A.2d 735, 737 (Pa. Super. 2006)).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Alonso Flores Salas
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 10-5141.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 2010.
178 L. Ed. 2d 164
Published
Citer courts: Superior Court of Pennsylvania (3)
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
[*165] Same case below, 372 Fed. Appx. 355.