green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
8.1 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1998 ·
…a district court has discretion to stay a petition which it may validly consider on the merits.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Calderon v. United States District Court
a district court has discretion to stay a petition which it may validly consider on the merits.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3624, 98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 4993 Arthur Calderon, Warden v. The United States District Court for the Northern District of California
a district court has discretion to stay a petition which it may validly consider on the merits.
cited
Cited "see"
Langford v. Day
See Greenawalt v. Stewart, 105 F.3d 1268, 1272 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, - U.S. 117 S.Ct. 794 , 136 L.Ed.2d 735 (1997).
cited
Cited "see"
98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 598, 98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 811, 98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 989 Terry Allen Langford v. Rick Day, Acting Administrator of Corrections Division Joseph P. Mazurek, Attorney General of the State of Montana Marc Racicot, Governor
See Greenawalt v. Stewart, 105 F.3d 1268, 1272 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 117 S.Ct. 794 , 136 L.Ed.2d 735 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ramon MARTINEZ-VILLAREAL, Petitioner, v. Terry STEWART, Respondent; Ramon MARTINEZ-VILLAREAL, Petitioner, v. Terry STEWART, Respondent
(2×)
See Greenawalt v. Stewart, 105 F.3d 1268, 1277 (9th Cir.) (“[T]he new 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (b)(2)(B) forecloses all successive-petition review of constitutional claims unrelated to guilt or innocence.”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 794 , 136 L.Ed.2d 735 (1997).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re: Pedro Medina
See Greenawalt v. Stewart, 105 F.3d 1268, 1277 (9th Cir.) (the § 2244(b)(2)(B) exception does not apply to an ineffective assistance of counsel at sentencing), cer t. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 794 , 136 L.Ed.2d 735 (1997); Greenawalt v. Stewart, 105 F.3d 1287, 1288 (9th Cir.1997) (the requirements of § 2244(b)(2)(B) are not satisfied by applicant’s claim that execution by lethal injection is unconstitutional, because that claim “is not relevant to the question whether he is guilty of murder in the first degree”).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Greenawalt
v.
Stewart, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections
v.
Stewart, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections
No. 96-7577 (A-521).
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 22, 1997.
Published
Citer courts: Ninth Circuit (2)
C. A. 9th Cir. Application for stay of execution of sentence of death, presented[*1103] to Justice O’Connor, and by her referred to the Court, denied. Certiorari denied.