green
Positive treatment
1.7 score
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
1000 Friends of Washington v. McFarland
See KCO 15051(1)(a) (Statement of Facts); KCO 15051(3) (explaining the interplay of these three ordinances); CP at 269-75 (Decl. of Harry Reinert, detailing process and need for the regulations); accord City of Seattle v. Yes for Seattle, 122 Wash.App. 382, 387, 390 , 93 P.3d 176 (2004) (holding that critical areas ordinances are development ordinances beyond the scope of the people's power of referendum), review denied, 153 Wash.2d 1020 , 108 P.3d 1228 (2005). [10] We decline the invitation to remand for further fact finding on this point, without prejudice, of course, to any timely substanti…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE
v.
LEE
v.
LEE
75787-9.
Washington Supreme Court.
Mar 1, 2005.
Published
Disposition of petition for review denied.