green
Positive treatment
4.6 score
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Murillo v. Kohl's Corp.
See Christense v. TDS Metrocom LLC, 2009 WI App 21 , 316 Wis.2d 356 n.4, 763 N.W.2d 248 (“[A] nondisclosure of facts, combined with an affirmative representation that is undermined by the non-disclosed facts, may result in liability under § 100.18(1).
cited
Cited "see"
White v. Marshall
See Christensen v. TDS Metrocom LLC, 2009 WI App 21 ¶ 17 , 316 Wis.2d 356 , 763 N.W.2d 248 (Wis.App.2008) (criticizing plaintiff for “bhujnng] the line between the two”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In re General Motors LLC Ignition Switch Litigation
Wis. 2016) (rejecting an argument that the plaintiffs could not make out a WDTPA claims because their complaint, “at least in part, tie[d] Kohls’ liability to certain price-related omissions,” noting that, “for every deceptive misstatement of fact, there will often be corresponding omission of truth”); see also Christense v. TDS Metrocom LLC, 316 Wis.2d 356 , 763 N.W.2d 248 n.4 (2008) (Table) (“[A] nondisclosure of facts, combined with an affirmative representation that is undermined by -the non-dis-elosed facts, may result in liability under [the WDTPA].
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE
v.
JOBSON[1].
v.
JOBSON[1].
2008AP367-CR.
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.
Dec 18, 2008.
Published
Unpublished opinion. Affirmed.
1 Petition for Review Filed.