California Codes
Cal. Civil Code § 1784 (2026)
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
CA-LEGleginfo.legislature.ca.gov
JustiaCode on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
No award of damages may be given in any action based on a method, act, or practice declared to be unlawful by Section 1770 if the person alleged to have employed or committed such method, act, or practice (a)proves that such violation was not intentional and resulted from a bona fide error notwithstanding the use of reasonable procedures adopted to avoid any such error and (b)makes an appropriate correction, repair or replacement or other remedy of the goods and services according to the provisions of subdivisions (b) and (c) of Section 1782.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 1942–2020 · leading case: Lunada Biomedical v. Nunez, 230 Cal. App. 4th 459 (Cal. Ct. App. 2014).
Lunada Biomedical v. Nunez, 230 Cal. App. 4th 459 (Cal. Ct. App. 2014). “(Civ. Code, § 1784.) Civil Code section 1752 of the CLRA provides, “The provisions of this title are not exclusive.”
Kowalsky v. Hewlett-Packard Co., 771 F. Supp. 2d 1138 (N.D. Cal. 2010). “” Cal. Civ.Code § 1784. This section does not, however, preclude the award of injunctive relief or restitution for unintentional violations.”
Oosten v. Hay Haulers Dairy Employees & Helpers Union, 291 P.2d 17 (Cal. 1955). “his obligations under the contract to sell or the sale, the buyer repudiates the contract or the sale, or notifies the *792 seller to proceed no further therewith, the buyer shall be liable to the seller for no greater damages than the seller would have suffered if he did…”
Wickman v. Opper, 188 Cal. App. 2d 129 (Cal. Ct. App. 1961). “The Civil Code expressly provides a measure of damages for the breach of a contract for the sale of goods (Civ. Code, § 1784), and for the sale of realty (Civ.”
Associated Press v. Emmett, 45 F. Supp. 907 (S.D. Cal. 1942). “The court used this language: “Civil Code, section 1784 (3), which is part of the Uniform Sales Act, provides that where a buyer fails to accept goods for which he has contracted, the ‘measure of damages is, in the absence of special circumstances, showing proximate damage of a…”
Clendenen v. Volkswagen Grp. of Am., Inc. (N.D. Cal. 2020). “27 4 Volkswagen also believes the Class Settlements satisfy the requirements of California Civil 1 As a preliminary matter, Plaintiffs assert that under California Civil Code § 1784, 2 Volkswagen can only benefit from a correction offer if the alleged CLRA violations were “not 3…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.