Cal. Codes » Civil Code
California Codes

Cal. Civil Code § 1788.32 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CA-LEGleginfo.legislature.ca.gov JustiaCode on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The remedies provided herein are intended to be cumulative and are in addition to any other procedures, rights, or remedies under any other provision of law. The enactment of this title shall not supersede existing administrative regulations of the Director of Consumer Affairs except to the extent that those regulations are inconsistent with the provisions of this title.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 2007–2020 · leading case: Gonzales v. Arrow Fin. Servs., LLC, 660 F.3d 1055 (9th Cir. 2011).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Gonzales v. Arrow Fin. Servs., LLC, 660 F.3d 1055 (9th Cir. 2011). · cites it 4× “" [13] CAL. CIV. CODE § 1788.32. [14] In an analogous case, the Eleventh Circuit held that a Florida consumer protection statute, which *1068 stated that its remedies were "cumulative," "contemplated dual enforcement—that an out of state debt collector could quite possibly be…”
Costa v. Nat'l Action Fin. Servs., 634 F. Supp. 2d 1069 (E.D. Cal. 2007). “” See Cal. Civ. Code § 1788.32 (“remedies provided herein are intended to be cumulative .”
Landry v. Bank of Am., N.A. (In re Landry), 493 B.R. 541 (Bankr. E.D. Cal. 2013). “(B) Violation of the debtor responsibility provisions of the bill could be raised as a defense by the debtor if such violation is “pertinent or relevant” to the action and if the violation by the debtor was intentional (Civil Code Section 1788.30(g)). (C) The remedies provided…”
Faircloth v. AR Resources, Inc. (N.D. Cal. 2020). “3d at 1067 (quoting Cal. Civ. Code § 1788.32 ). A claimant may recover under 26 both the FDCPA and the RFDCPA.”
Hanrahan v. Statewide Collection, INC. (N.D. Cal. 2020). “”); see also Cal. Civ. Code § 1788.32 (“The remedies 24 provided herein are intended to be cumulative and are in addition to any other 25 procedures, rights, or remedies under any other provision of law.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.